What do Hillary Clinton and the Russian lawyer who landed a meeting with Donald Trump Jr., promising damning information on Hillary, have in common? Both opposed Russian sanctions that targeted human-rights abusers.
Perhaps showing some “collusion” of her own, Hillary’s opposition to those sanctions were “coincidentally” around the same time Bill Clinton gave a speech in Moscow that he was paid a handsome $500,000 for.
A leaked email from Clinton’s foreign campaign spokesperson Jesse Lehrich, previously published by Wikileaks, shines light on how the Clinton campaign tried to prevent the public from being aware of Bill’s speech.
In one of her emails, Lehrich writes that the Clinton campaign “with the help of the research team…killed a Bloomberg story trying to link HRC’s opposition to the Magnitsky bill [the aforementioned sanctions] to a $500,000 speech that WJC [Bill Clinton] gave in Moscow.”
According to Fox News:
Trump White House officials now are trying to draw attention to that speech and the Clintons’ ties to Russia in a bid to counter criticism over Trump Jr.’s now-infamous meeting.
“If you want to talk about having relationships with Russia, I’d look no further than the Clintons,” Deputy Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders said at a briefing last week. “Bill Clinton was paid half a million dollars to give a speech to a Russian bank, personally thanked by President Putin.”
The former president indeed had received a personal call from then-Prime Minister Vladimir Putin expressing his appreciation for the speech. According to Mrs. Clinton’s ethics disclosure form filed while she was secretary of State, Bill Clinton was paid $500,000 by the Russia-based finance company Renaissance Capital for his June 29, 2010, speech in Moscow to its employees and guests attending the company’s annual conference.
The speech is now coming back to haunt the Clintons, considering the company that cut the check was allegedly tied to the scandal that spurred the Global Magnitsky Act, a bill that imposed sanctions on Russians designated as human-rights abusers and eventually would become law in 2012.
This was the same law Russian attorney Natalia Veselnitskaya was lobbying against during her sit-down with Trump Jr. last year. And back in 2010, it would have put the Clintons on her side.
Shortly before Bill Clinton’s speech in 2010, when members of Congress pushing the sanctions bill had asked Hillary Clinton to refuse visas to Russian officials implicated under the policy, the State Department denied the request. The Obama administration initially was opposed to the Magnitsky Act because then-President Barack Obama was seeking a “reset” with Russia and did not want to deepen the divide between the two countries.
Former President Bill Clinton’s speech to Renaissance just weeks later was all the more curious, considering Renaissance’s Russian investment bank executives would have been banned from the U.S. under the law.
So while Donald Trump Jr. responded to the news of his meeting by publicly posting all his relevant emails to Twitter, the Clinton campaign tried to kill a Bloomberg story exposing their actions.
Who do you think is more trustworthy?