The fact that this news won’t be shocking to some is a testament to how quickly we’ve been desensitized to the brutality of ISIS. From execution of children, genocide, war crimes, and destruction of historical sites, there truly is no atrocity ISIS won’t commit.
A new revelation documenting the extent of ISIS atrocities has been made public, which we’re doubtful “has nothing to do with Islam” as Hillary Clinton would like us to believe.
As the Washington Examiner reported:
The Islamic State’s religious scholars have ruled that taking the organs of non-Muslims is permissible under Islamic law to save the life of a Muslim, because killing apostates to eat their flesh has previously been allowed.
The news agency posted a U.S. government translation of the document attributed to the Islamic State’s research and fatwa committee.
“Allah almighty knows what’s best and knows what’s right and what is wrong and there is evidence from texts and Islamic principles and laws supporting the notion that transplanting organs from an apostate’s body into a Muslim body in order to save the latter’s life or replace a damaged organ with it is permissible,” the document reads.
Citing the Koran, the Islamic State scholars wrote that saving a Muslim from “death and deterioration is an Islamic legal duty.”
Obama can say ISIS isn’t Islamic all he wants. ISIS would be shocked to hear that.
Their caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi holds a Ph.D. in Islamic Studies. When Al-Baghdadi says that ISIS is Islamic, we’re taking the word of an expert.
[Note: This article was written by The Analytical Economist]