Shocking statistic: Is this what happens when you repeal “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”

In 2010, President Obama signed the repeal of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” in the military, allowing gay, lesbian and bisexual soldiers to serve openly in all branches of the armed forces.

Are there unintended consequences? Well, take a look at these statistics, and you decide.

As CNS News reports, Defense Secretary Ashton Carter told a group of ROTC cadets on Wednesday that last year, far more men (10,400) than women (8,500) “experienced unwanted sexual contact.

Carter added that “too few” men reported the incidents as sexual assault.

So…based on these numbers, you get the impression sexual assaults against men in the military are on the rise. That’s not a good sign.

And one can infer what might happen as more and more women serve combat positions.

In fact, CNS reports “one of the female cadets asked Carter how opening combat positions to women squares with the military’s effort to end sexual assault.”

“Obviously, as we get women into more unaccustomed positions, maybe dangerous, isolated positions, maybe positions where they are fewer, in relation to the number of men, it opens up opportunities for predators,” Carter replied.

“So on the one hand, it can lead in that direction. On the other hand, I think it kind of signifies to — everyone will get used to working, men and women together, to defend the country and do these things.”

We shall see Secretary Carter, we shall see.

Leave a Reply

113 Comments on "Shocking statistic: Is this what happens when you repeal “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
drunkcynic
Guest

No; a hundred times no. It is the expansion of the fight against ‘sexual harassment’ and hazing that has pushed beyond the bounds of the required into the realm of excessive political correctness. It as not as if the decision to repeal DADT suddenly gave motivation to those affected to commit sexual harassment. Correlation between separate events doesn’t imply causation.

Pappy
Guest

That’s actually incorrect. Correlation between separate events certainly can imply causation, it just does not PROVE it.

Paul Sheridan
Guest

That depends on whether you’re using implication in the colloquial sense of the word or the formal logical principle as in “A implies B”

Pappy
Guest

You may want to look up “imply” in the dictionary and also “colloquial.” Even if there is a specialized usage for imply in math, the normal definition of imply is not a colloquialism. Not sure there are any common colloquial uses for imply…

Paul Sheridan
Guest

It’s more precise to say that correlation is a necessary but not sufficient condition to imply causation.

Pappy
Guest

Correlation is a necessary but not sufficient condition to prove causation. Correlation can imply causation, it cannot prove it by itself. Imply = suggest. Implications are not reality, they are suggestions of what reality might be. You can have very strong implications of a causal relationship between a and b, but discover in the end that a does not cause b.

Paul Sheridan
Guest

colloquial
[kuh-loh-kwee-uh l]
adjective
1.
characteristic of or appropriate to ordinary or familiar conversation rather than formal speech or writing; informal.

So what’s the problem?

Pappy
Guest

Imply formally means to suggest, rather than state with certainty. Nothing colloquial or informal about it. Only reason I raised the point is that correlations are valuable to observe for what they imply. I believe your point, which I think valid, would be that we cannot take these inferences as fact. My point is that we need to consider what is implied as inspiration or guidance for what needs to be investigated, proven or disproven.

Paul Sheridan
Guest

Meh. To be honest I was being a bit of a pedantic troll. You’re not an idiot and you understand that correlation isn’t causation so we don’t really have an argument.

Pappy
Guest

Yeah…

Hartbreaker
Guest

So you really believe that the removal of the fear of being dishonorably discharged for even appearing gay would have no affect on gay men hitting on other men? That is naive.

drunkcynic
Guest

Gay men hitting on other men doesn’t constitute inappropriate sexual touching. Straight men ball tapping each other does.

The majority of the US Military doesn’t care about the sexual preferences of the person next to them, as long as their qualified for the job and execute their responsibilities.

Guest
Guest

➯➯➯➯➯I RECEIVED FIRST DRAFT OF $13000!@ak10:

➨➨➨➨https://FreeMediaMac.com/Lion/Heart

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Nailed it! Before the repeal no one would openly hit on you because there was the chance if the person was reported they would be AR-15 or worse, now it’s no big deal (supposedly) if they hit on someone, except the fact that good ol’ boys are still plentiful and accidents have a way of happening. Don’t take it the wrong way but it’s still the minority and most still don’t agree with the repeal and certainly don’t agree with a supposed Commander that does not respect service members.

drunkcynic
Guest

So, you’re calling or Blue on Blue violence, degrading the capability of the force to perform the mission. Live, let live, and get the job done.

Earl Lee
Guest

Don’t know what branch you were in but when I was stationed in Germany back in 83…some of the gays and lesbians were OPEN without fear of article 15’s

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

I served in the Army, 5th Infantry 4 BN 1 FA, Gulf War era 1990-1991…maybe it was because I was in Field Artillery but can’t say I recall too many Moes floating around when I was in, let alone out and proud.

android
Guest
All other things aside, introducing women or homosexuals into combat puts EVERYONE in the unit in danger for no other reason than human nature. How do you train a man whose been raised to defer to women (all used to be and most still are no matter how much effort the hard left puts into it) to ignore chivalry (in some cases) or a love interest (requited or not) in favor of the mission? More, love-gone-bad has ruined companies, rock bands, families and political careers. How in the name of common sense can the military be expected to be immune… Read more »
Guest
Guest

☛☛☛ I RECEIVED FIRST DRAFT OF $13000!@ak35:

,,,,,

➨➨➨➨http://MediaMacsNews.com/dream/zone

Kat50
Guest

There already people leaving in droves, especially chaplains and christians. Parents aren’t letting them sigh up. I believe all christians should get out while they can and leave to the liberals to fight the wars in the middle east.

Brendan
Guest

What about all the liberal Christians?

Alondra
Guest

IDIOT, there is NO such thing “liberal Christians” !!!
Christ is Conservative !!!
So there are Christians vs. the Devil’s [email protected] !!!

majorwiblit
Guest

BS….G’sus was a liberal,,,,

Alondra
Guest

In YOUR sick Delusional full of BS lame brain !!!

Brendan
Guest

Christ was a liberal.
Maybe you should read your Bible kid

Alondra
Guest

I know that you are STUPID, so STOP to expose YOUR STUPIDITY !!!

Brendan
Guest

Jesus believed in helping the sick and the poor… something conservatives like you oppose.

Christopher Lee Hartsock
Guest
Christopher Lee Hartsock
Not true. Jesus also said many things not ‘liberal’. He was against sex out of wedlock. He was definitely opposed to abortion. His biggest opponent was a strong central government. The parable of the talents was a baseline lesson in free market consequences. He was opposed to theft. He probably didn’t care much for antitheists. Jesus didn’t ask Pontius Pilate or Barack Obama to heal the sick. He did it himself, and gave that power to those who follow him. He DECIDEDLY would make Hillary sell all she had, give it to the poor, and follow Him. He doesn’t have… Read more »
Brendan
Guest

Sorry kid… your presumptions are pure fantasy… apparently you like to make up what Jesus said.
You say he opposed centralized government… where did he say that?
Your imagination doesn’t count
Liberals oppose theft too… that comment was absurd

And yes… Conservatives would not feed the poor or help the sick.. current politics prove that.
opposition to healthcare and cutting programs that help the poor are all part of their platform… as well as demonizing the poor.

Phony conservative Christians ignore the teachings of jesus

Jerone A. Bowers
Guest

It is not that conservatives don’t believe in helping the sick and poor it is that subsidizing them for their entire life span is not really helping. In fact it does more harm than good.

Alondra
Guest

L I A R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Don’t TWIST REALITY, Mentally UNDERDEVELOPED Liberal.

majorwiblit
Guest
Why is Jesus a Liberal? Webster’s dictionary defines a Liberal as one who is open minded, not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional or established forms or ways. Jesus was a pluralist Liberal who taught that one need not conform to strict and orthodox views of God, religion, and life. He rejected greed, violence, the glorification of power, the amassing of wealth without social balance, and the personal judging of others, their lifestyles and beliefs. Certainly, Jesus brought a radically Liberal theology to the Orthodox believers of his time. Jesus IS a Liberal even today because now more than… Read more »
Alondra
Guest
L I A R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! First of all, you, Libs with the Mental demetia, constantly re-defining words. You, LibTards, hijacked the word “gay” which means joyful, happy, merry. It’s totally opposite who HOMOSEXUALS are. They are unhappy, angry, mean, miserable and pitiful living being. HOMOSEXUAL ≠ Gay You, LibTards, invented the new term “gender identity”, because they know that there, in the Mother Nature, are only TWO “sexes” – male and female. Thus the TRUTH you are calling “hate”; the legitimate and appropriate criticism you call the “hate speech”; who disagree with your Fascistic LYING PROPAGANDA those are “haters”; who… Read more »
majorwiblit
Guest

“Even a man who is pure at heart and says his prayers
by night,, May become a Werewolf, when the Wolf-bane
blooms and the full moon is bright….

Christopher Lee Hartsock
Guest
Christopher Lee Hartsock

You think he was okay with dissecting babies alive in the wombs of their mothers?
Probably not.

Rafael X
Guest

LOL Jesus was a pinko commie. “Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” Matthew 19:24

Alondra
Guest

Mentally PERVERT LIAR, read Chris’s Parable about the “Fair Pay” (Matthew 20:1-16)

The moral of that Parable is:
“Friend, I am doing you no wrong. Did you not agree with me for a denarius? Take what belongs to you and go. I CHOOSE to give to this last worker as I give you. Am I NOT ALLOWED TO DO WHAT I CHOOSE WITH WHAT BELONGS TO ME? Or DO YOU BEGRUDGE MY GENEROSITY?

Paul Sheridan
Guest

The parable wasn’t about wages. It was using wages as a metaphor for salvation. Because it was a parable. That’s what a parable is, a metaphor.
P-A-R-A-B-L-E.
Look it up.

Alondra
Guest

Ah, another biblical scholar crawled out from his cave.
Learn WHAT metaphor is !!!

Rafael X
Guest

Jesus could have been gay too. I mean never married and hanging out with 12 dudes all the time.

Alondra
Guest

We know that you are a Mentally challanged LYING SLANDERER !!!
So keep barking your daddy’s DECEITS !!!

Rafael X
Guest

It’s not about me. It’s about Jesus having gay sex and writing the Bible while having marijuana parties.

Alondra
Guest

It’s about YOUR Mental Perversion, Filthy Stinky Skunk.

Rafael X
Guest

My mental perversion is called logic. Provided by God himself.

Christopher Lee Hartsock
Guest
Christopher Lee Hartsock

Boring troll.

Alondra
Guest

RIGHT !!! Who just could doubt ???
Provided by YOUR god Belial aka allah.

Rafael X
Guest

The wars conservatives started? Sure they can stay home. They are traitors anyways.

Alondra
Guest

STOP to spur YOUR STUPIDITY, Rafa !!!

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Afghanistan was started by Clinton…you should learn which Presidents actually were in office. The majority of wars were while Dems were President. Reading is fundamental, NOT for the mental.

Brendan
Guest

Really?
Please explain how Clinton “started” the war in Afghanistan.

Also, I am always amused by the false assertion that Democrats started the majority of wars.

Lou9999
Guest

Last 100 years of US military history. WWI-Democrat in WH (approx 117K KIA). WWII- Democrats in WH (approx 350K KIA). Korea-Democrat in WH (approx 36K KIA). Vietnam-Democrats in WH for the majority (approx 58K KIA). Iraq and Afghanistan combine-Republican in WH (approx 7500 KIA). Hmmm, I wonder why people think Dems get us in wars.

Brendan
Guest
Because people who read those numbers and think Democrats cause more wars know nothing about history. You are looking at wars that started while Democrats were in the White House. But you are ignoring wars that were started by Presidents in the White House. Do you think the United States of America started World War Two? Are you seriously blaming America for starting World War Two. Instead of counting the number of wars in the last hundred years that happened while Democrats or Republicans were President… try counting the number of wars started by Democrat or Republican Presidents. I’m going… Read more »
Lou9999
Guest
WWI-we were “secretly supporting the Allies”. We got caught with ammo during the sinking of the Lusitania. WWII; FDR was itching to get in the fight. We were already supplying the allies with arms and materials. I see that you forgot about Korea (called the Forgotten War) Korea: Truman gutted the military after WWII (even tried to get rid of the Marines). When you are weak, enemies attack. Vietnam-that one is on Kennedy. He was told that going there was a bad idea. Now the list that is weak compared to the big wars we have fought. Cambodia and Laos… Read more »
Brendan
Guest
I assure you I did not blink and miss Grenada… and no Americans were being held hostage. I agree that both parties are responsible for wars… but I do see a difference between a President who is in office when war comes to him and a President who chooses to start a war. And you’re right i did accidentally leave Korea off because of the UN… so I’ll put that one… and Lebanon… on the lists. As to Truman “gutting” the military after World War Two… we had 20 million men on active duty because we were fighting massive campaigns… Read more »
Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Afghanistan originated in 1998 after the Embassy bombing with Clinton retaliating.
False assertions such as WW1-Woodrow Wilson, WW2-FDR, Korea-Truman, Vietnam-Kennedy/Johnson…I’m not going to get into stuff like Kosovo, Bosnia, et all those because most of those were also Democrat Presidents. You still amused?

Brendan
Guest
Yes…I’m amused. Saying Clinton “started” the war in Afghanistan by striking back at Al Qaeda for attacking our embassies is absurd. How is retaliating the same as starting? That was stupid. How did Clinton start a war against Al Qaeda if Al Qaeda struck first? Do you know what the word “started” means? And I’m glad you won’t bring up Kosovo and Bosnia… that was nice of you. I bet you won’t bring up Libya, Lebanon, Grenada, Panama, Somalia, or Iraq either… right? I also find it amusing that you blame Democrats for World War Two and Korea… .especially when… Read more »
Lou9999
Guest

You are correct…we were attacked in WWII. Kind of like the Afghanistan. If you remember, Afghanistan is where the terrorists were being sheltered by the ruling government.

Brendan
Guest

I absolutely agree.
I do not fault a President for responding to an attack>
Bush did not start the war in Afghanistan.
Al Qaeda started the war in Afghanistan by striking us first and the ruling Taliban was sheltering them.

Alondra
Guest

S I C K O !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Oh BTW, had we not interfered with Japan during the whole invasion of Manchuria and let them attain manifest destiny the same way we did, they probably would not have even thought of attacking one of our naval installations.

Brendan
Guest

Oh… and how did we interfere with the 1931 invasion of Manchuria?
You do realize that their manifest destiny meant control of the Pacific.
And how exactly did we provoke them into invading the Philippines and bombing our fleet at Pearl harbor?

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Somalia was also Clinton…c’mon Brother, you were in the Army also. Regardless how it happens, the one who chose to go to war was a Democrat President. You are basically defending a call to action. Korea was strictly Cold-War politics between us and Russia which led to the 38th parallel and when N Korea invaded S Korea, we chose to intervene with the UN Council, WE were not attacked, South Korea was.

Rafael X
Guest

Bush ordered the invasion of Afghanistan.

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Really? So he did that while Clinton was still in office?
The Aug ’98 bombings of Afghanistan and the Sudan (Operation Infinite Reach) were strikes on bases that started Aug 20, 1998 and was retaliation for the Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania that killed 224 people and injured 5000 others…go ahead, look it up.

Rafael X
Guest

Who got us involved in Iraq and why?

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

So you’re willing to concede all the Democrat wars so you can try and save face because Bush got us involved in Iraq? So the fact that WW1, WW2, Korea, Vietnam, and all the other ones like Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan Somalia, were all started by Democrat Presidents is somehow ok because Bush called for war in Iraq that Hillary also voted for?

Brendan
Guest

Somalia was not started by a Democrat. Go check your calender.

And we didn’t start World War Two or Korea.

And your continued insistence that striking back at Al Qaeda for bombing our embassies is us “starting” a war is absurd

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Black Hawk Down (Gothic Serpent) was Oct 1993…like I said CLINTON. You lose your calender in the war troop?

Brendan
Guest
Our mission in Somalia began in 2002 in an operation launched by President Bush… not Clinton. Again, check your calender. You are talking about one operation a year later and that makes you a hypocrite. Pay attention… You think the war in Afghanistan began with Clinton launching a retaliatory cruise missile strike… so you do not credit Bush for the actual invasion. BUT… You do not hold Bush sr responsible for putting US troops ion Somalia and lay that squarely at the feet of Clinton. That’s hypocritical. Also, I see below that you said that US forces where there in… Read more »
Paul Sheridan
Guest

U.S. troops arrived in Somalia on December 9th 1992. If you’re going to be sarcastic you’d better make sure you’re right.

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

When we originally arrived it was non-combative support in August 1992 to be exact…you can research that. Shit just happened to turn ugly and the mission changed in March 1993. I don’t blame Presidents for entering into situations, it’s what we do. The US are the friggin world’s babysitters and keepers of the moral right, even when we are totally in the wrong! LOL

Paul Sheridan
Guest

The mission did change from securing food shipments to disarming the militia forces that’s true. But you’re moving the goalposts constantly to make sure that democrats are responsible for every war ever. Korea and Somalia were both UN missions but you choose to count one as a war only after Clinton was elected and pretend the other one was some sort of non-event. It’s disingenuous at best.

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Well if we move the goalposts further down, 9/11 would fall in Clinton’s hands instead of Bush but instead lets play the ball where it lies. I’m not changing Somalia to fall in Clinton’s administration. The mission changed when it changed and is clearly out of my control. I’m neither a Dem or a Republican so I couldn’t care less, but at the same time, it gets a little old hearing how everything is the fault of the Republicans.

Brendan
Guest

no one here is sayi9ng everything is the fault of the Republicans, but you sure do seem to be saying everything is the fault of the democrats

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

I’m not saying everything is the fault of the Dems, I’m saying I don’t agree with everyone trying to make the Dems out as the fantastic party that actually has the peoples best interests in mind. Neither party does, they’re both played out and not working in the best interest of its citizens.

Alondra
Guest

DITO !!!

Rafael X
Guest

Where are we still involved? All those wars you are naming are over. And why did Bush get us involved in Iraq?

Alondra
Guest
L I A R !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Iraq war was the Bush’s war as well as it was the DemonRats like the Senate Majority Leader tom daschele, the WHORE Hitlery, the Clown biden, the Vietnam “hero” johnny al-kerry, Kriminal snake reid, the Stupid Idiot schumer, the Banker Kapitalist rockefeller, the Korrupt Kriminal dodd, the Korrupt Anti-Gun madam d.feinstein, the wife-cheater Play Boy j.edwards, etc. 1) Bush did ask Congress and got bi-partisan Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Saddam Hussein. The Iraq War Resolution was a BIPARTISAN resolution that “passed by the United States Congress in October 2002 as Public Law… Read more »
majorwiblit
Guest

you will be judged for your lies and deceit…..

Alondra
Guest

“You are of your father the Devil, and the DESIRES OF YOUR FATHER YOU WANT TO DO. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does NOT STAND IN THE TRUTH, because THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM. When he speaks a LIE, he speaks from his own resources, for HE IS a LIAR AND the FATHER OF IT. ~ Jesus Christ (John 8:44)

And WHO will judge me ??? You, Pitiful LIAR ???
P.S. Refute what I stated, Pathetic LOSER !!!!!!!!!!!

Alondra
Guest

“אתה של האבא שלך השטן, ואת הרצונות של האבא שלך שאתה רוצה
לעשות. הוא אינו עומד באת האמת, כי אין אמת בו … הוא שקרן ואב לIT. ”

P.S. Refute what I stated. If NOT, so you are a proving LIAR,
Pathetic LOSER.

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Didn’t realize Afghanistan was over…must have been accomplished by our great POtuS Barrack Hussein. Originally Iraq invaded Kuwait, the the BS Bush and Tony Blair would have you believe was “to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein’s support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people.”…if you can believe that BS reason. I didn’t agree with involvement in Iraq then, nor any other time.

Rafael X
Guest

Another stupid “article”. We have male CO’s guarding female prisoners. Female CO’s guarding male prisoners and we expect them all to act like pros. Same with police force. Why can’t we expect the same thing from our soldiers?

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Because unlike corrections officers who punch a clock, our soldiers have to live together, eat together, shower together, as well as fight and possibly die next to the next person.

Rafael X
Guest

So?

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

You are trying to compare county and state babysitters with 24-7 soldiers and how we have to live? That’s not even apples to apples.

Rafael X
Guest

Stop hiding behind your uniform and argue logic. No one is forced to be a soldier. I did not have it in me to volunteer. Who am I to care about or question the sexual preference of someone who has the courage to serve?

Richard William Byers
Guest
Richard William Byers
Okay let’s argue logic; the issue is not about “what an individual does behind closed doors.” Why do women have separate bathroom facilities in every aspect of retail society. Why do gyms have segregated showers? The physiology of the sexes does not require these facilities. It is the nature of personal privacy; the idea that an individual is safe from the predation or simple scrutiny of the “opposite” sex. What is the difference from a homosexual male and heterosexual male. By peoples own arguments in this thread the only real difference is “sex.” Who they desire and who they wish… Read more »
Rafael X
Guest

If it’s just a “proclivity” treat it like drugs. Just say no. Unless you are doubting your own proclivities.

Christopher Lee Hartsock
Guest
Christopher Lee Hartsock

Troll alert.

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

Whatever is done in the privacy of their quarters is what it is but someone should not be made to feel uncomfortable in their living situation simply because the other happens to outwardly or even force themselves on another. Now what if the outward gay happens to be a high ranking NCO or Officer and the other a low ranking Enlisted who is scared to speak up? That sort of abuse would go unreported and that troop already has enough to be concerned with, let alone be forced into that sort of environment.

Rafael X
Guest

Be made to feel uncomfortable? Are you really a soldier? How does someone force themselves on you if you don’t get under the sheets? Just because they’re gay doesn’t mean they’re attracted to you. Do you worry as much about women facing sexual abuse in the military? That “sort of environment” is everywhere in America. I had to work for a company once where half the staff was gay. Had to make myself comfortable pretty fast because the other option was public assistance.

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest
Explaining military lifestyle to someone who’s job opportunities fall somewhere in between La Cage aux Folles and foodstamps is like fighting an uphill battle. You must assume that we just punch a clock, go home at the end of the work day, and have the same freedoms we actually defend? That would be the first misconception. Imagine a 17-18-19 year old being constantly harassed (you are under the assumption that it has to lead to sex to be constituted as sexual assault) or emotionally abused. If we were discussing just women in combat units we would not be having this… Read more »
Rafael X
Guest

When you rely on the free market instead of the military industrial complex. Sometimes you may be faced with some hard choices. It’s part of the drawbacks of civilian life, not having to take orders. Was it sexual assault every time you came on to a girl? I’m sure tons of them said no. Seriously? Men’s sexual abuse in the military is a big deal? No limit to you guys persecution complex. Black people have lessons to learn in playing victims.

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest
Firstly, I live in the civilian world and have for over 20 years. I am self employed and rely heavily on my skills and knowledge. I returned to school after I left the military and already had college education before I entered. No one forced you into a life that disregarded furthering your education or using your time more wisely, but it’s funny about black people still playing victim because it seems that some have a little too much of late. How is it in 2015 there are black people who honestly feel they deserve reparations for something that didn’t… Read more »
Rafael X
Guest

It’s about black people now. What do you know of my education?

Pádraig O'Doul
Guest

You said “No limit to you guys persecution complex. Black people have lessons to learn in playing victims.” I just happened to comment that there are quite a few playing the victim role. Assuming your lack of choices of where you seek gainful employment, one would correlate the lack of upward mobility with a lack of education or desirable skill sets.

Rafael X
Guest

Or just the state of the market at place I was at that time.

Alondra
Guest

The Depraved-in-chief demoralized the U.S.Military.

Rafael X
Guest

If their goal is to serve one man they can all move to North-Korea.

Alondra
Guest

WHY you do NOT move where are you came from, the Devil’s [email protected]???

Rafael X
Guest

No hablo Korean.

Alondra
Guest

Yeah, I know. Tu ablas Demonico Helliatico.

majorwiblit
Guest

אישה משוגעת שמדברת כמו השטן

Alondra
Guest

Жизнь трудна, но еще труднее, когда ты идиот !!!
La vida es dura, pero es aún más dura cuando eres IDIOTA !!!

Alondra
Guest

“טיפש טוב יותר שנון משנינות טיפשית” ~ שייקספיר

Rafael X
Guest

Language of the devil?

Alondra
Guest

I did not ask you to de-code your language.
We know that.

majorwiblit
Guest

người phụ nữ điên người nói giống như ma quỷ

Alondra
Guest

người đàn ông điên người nói giống như ma quỷ

Macker
Guest
Kevin Lynch
Guest

the fact that political correctness had taken foothold in our national defense has me concerned. The military is only strong when orders are acted on without question or defiance. Political correctness appears to encourage questioning ones authority which can get people killed. there is a lot of speculation about the effects of the direction our military is moving and one tends to forget that guns and missiles are only good when you have them. Our warriors need to learn to fight wirhout them to survive.

WILLIAMS
Guest

< MURPHY,,,But what do you need to eat to lose the weight rapidly? From low-carb, to low-fat, to sugar-free, to high protein, and even the ‘caveman’ diet – there are so many options out there that it can be extremely confusing to the average person on which diet you should use to quickly lose weight. Some of these diets even provide conflicting information on what you should and shouldn’t eat. Well, that’s all about to change. This FREE Report may help you also

http://tlc.com/fitness9

——————————–