Worst deal ever: Obama poised to completely cave to Iran on nukes

It is a perplexing time for foreign relations to say the least. America finds itself dropping bombs to support a stalled Iranian-backed Iraqi Army offensive against ISIS in Tikrit. We are providing support to a Sunni Arab nation coalition against Iranian-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen. And yet we’re engaged in nuclear negotiations with the Iranian regime — the number one state sponsor of Islamic terrorism in the world. However, America also removed Iran and Hezbollah from the terrorist list, so this latest revelation should come as no surprise to any of us.

As reported by the Washington Free Beacon, “The Obama administration is giving in to Iranian demands about the scope of its nuclear program as negotiators work to finalize a framework agreement in the coming days, according to sources familiar with the administration’s position in the negotiations.”

“U.S. negotiators are said to have given up ground on demands that Iran be forced to disclose the full range of its nuclear activities at the outset of a nuclear deal, a concession experts say would gut the verification the Obama administration has vowed would stand as the crux of a deal with Iran.”

“Until recently, the Obama administration had maintained that it would guarantee oversight on Tehran’s program well into the future, and that it would take the necessary steps to ensure that oversight would be effective. The issue has now emerged as a key sticking point in the talks.”

So here we are in the final throes of negotiation, and instead of operating from a position of strength, it appears that the Iranians — who are still holding four American hostages — are calling the shots. As Benjamin Netanyahu stated, it appears the American goal is any deal — even if it’s a bad deal — is better than no deal at all.

And as we speak, the estimated 10,000 centrifuges are still turning. Because of such actions by the Obama administration, it’s no surprise the Sunni Arab nations feel betrayed and abandoned — although I am supportive of seeing them take a more active role in their security.

The position we should be taking with Iran is one that completely denies their acquisition of nuclear capability. If anything we should reach out and provide them supplemental energy resources if that is the concern — which we know is not.

And we know President Obama has threatened to veto any legislation from Congress for return of sanctions as well as any legislation that requires Congressional approval. As well, President Obama has threatened to go directly to the United Nations for approval in the Security Council for his proposed “deal.”

So what does all of this mean — other than placing a dangerous weapon in the hands of a fanatical Islamic theocratic regime?

The Free Beacon writes, “Concern from sources familiar with U.S. concessions in the talks comes amid reports that Iran could be permitted to continue running nuclear centrifuges at an underground site once suspected of housing illicit activities. This type of concession would allow Iran to continue work related to its nuclear weapons program, even under the eye of international inspectors. If Iran removes inspectors—as it has in the past—it would be left with a nuclear infrastructure immune from a strike by Western forces. “Once again, in the face of Iran’s intransigence, the U.S. is leading an effort to cave even more toward Iran—this time by whitewashing Tehran’s decades of lying about nuclear weapons work and current lack of cooperation with the [International Atomic Energy Agency],” said one Western source briefed on the talks but who was not permitted to speak on record.”

We know Israel did indeed spy on these talks with which I have no issue, as I discussed with Stuart Varney on Fox Business News, since we needed someone to provide us with openness and transparency. Through the speech given by Netanyahu at the joint session of Congress, we came to understand some of the specifics of this deal, which doesn’t stop an Iranian nuclear program – in fact, it barely slows it down.

“Instead of ensuring that Iran answers all the outstanding questions about the past and current military dimensions of their nuclear work in order to obtain sanctions relief, the U.S. is now revising down what they need to do,” said the source. “That is a terrible mistake—if we don’t have a baseline to judge their past work, we can’t tell if they are cheating in the future, and if they won’t answer now, before getting rewarded, why would they come clean in the future?” The United States is now willing to let Iran keep many of its most controversial military sites closed to inspectors until international sanctions pressure has been lifted, according to sources. This scenario has been criticized by nuclear experts, including David Albright, founder and president of the Institute for Science and International Security.”

It’s very hard to discern what the Obama administration’s objective is in this case. However, one thing is clearly evident — we are about to sign a piece of paper with an enemy that is a clear and present danger to the Middle East region, our best ally in the region — Israel — and the national security of the United States. The consequences and ramifications will be far-reaching and long lasting.


      • It takes more than a program to keep track of all the factions and their affiliations, that’s for sure.

        Obama was for the Muslim Spring and backed the Brotherhood and their man when he stepped in to take power in Egypt. Then, when the Egyptian army and the majority of Egypt’s citizens saw what the Brotherhood had in store for the country they vomited the Brotherhood out of the country – the Brotherhood were Sunni.

        So as clearly as it is possible to discern, Obama was backing the Sunni then but now appears to be cozy with the Shia.in Iran.
        Which begs the question, just who’s side is Obama on or, is he busy at making sure both sides destroy each other? And, if that’s the case, isn’t making it easy for Iran to have a Nuke an indication that he favors the Shia? To muddy up the water a bit, off to the side is the question of which persuasion are the millions of Muslims immigrating to the US, and attempting to establish Sharia within their enclaves?

        That last question notwithstanding, the crux of the issue, regarding either faction, is both have no love for Western values or their people and each is dedicated to winning the planet for Allah. So while the fight over who gets the spoils of the world the only question that remains is by which means and method will the world be faced with when it fights for its survival.

        That Obama appears to sympathize with Islam over the West is clear to me, but who he cares to see win out is really anyone’s guess.

    • We’ve seen Obama aiding the Muslim Brotherhood Sunnis in Egypt, Libya and Yemen and he almost aided them in Syria, too. Now it seems he is supporting the Shiites in Iran. Obama’s father and stepfather were Sunni, but his Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett was born in Iran, maybe the goal is to play both sides against the middle. Both sides mean the Sunni and Shiite Muslims and the middle being Israel.

      No matter how you look at it, it’s impossible to make sense out of it. Does anyone really know what the “Obama Doctrine” entails? So far it just looks like he has helped to create chaos, anarchy and instability in the Muslim world.

  1. When is enough, enough with this guy? Clinton was impeached over a blue dress and a lie. Obama is on the verge of destroying the world.

      • This from wikipedia: Bill Clinton, the 42nd President of the United States, was impeached by the House of Representatives on two charges, one of perjury and one ofobstruction of justice, on December 19, 1998. – Low info voter you might want to read up.

      • Well it would at least be a start for Obama to maybe put the brakes on his rapid descent of destruction for our country.

      • No sir…impeached does not mean “removed from power”…it is to “be accused”…Nixon was impeached…and then resigned in the best interest of the country. I am a History teacher and this term is misunderstood by many…

      • This is splitting hairs, but TECHNICALLY Nixon wasn’t impeached. He met with Congressional leaders who told him that the House was certain to impeach him and the Senate would almost certainly convict him but he resigned his office before the House actually voted on the articles of impeachment.

      • “Impeachment” is simply officially charging the official with a crime and it is followed by a hearing. It means the same thing as when a civilian is “indicted”, which is also followed by a hearing.

      • there you go with the racist sht why is it that most who throw the racist word around are the true racist just because he is negro does not have anything to do with him destroying America never thought I would see a muslime negro that hates America soo much

      • You race-baiting pieces of chit are funny. You shout RACE as a reflex never even realizing that you are doing it on a black person’s page or that the people you are talking to happily support and elect black politicians on the strength of their conservative values while they oppose Baraq on the weakness of his. There is only one appropriate reply: Flock ewe.

  2. Many millions of us saw this coming from a mile away which is why we tried to keep this feckless clown out of the White House. Now our chickens are coming home to roost (Credit: Wright, Jeremiah).

    While this pathetic POS and his minions called everyone not wanting to let Iran acquire nuclear weapons a “warmonger,” in the typical “you agree with me or you’re extreme” style that has been so effective for them, Iran is cleaning his clock, well on the way to nukes, the entire middle east is on fire and we are on the doorstep of a bloodbath.

    Hope the libs are happy. This is what they voted for.

      • I think android was agreeing with U…..this is the Liberal “Go To” move. Again and Again U see them attempt the Moral high ground and label anyone disagreeing with them as Warmongers OR whatever fits the current Bill of Discussion. Iran IS getting everything it wants by delaying or refusing…..be it Inspections or whatever……they WANT to have Nucular Weapons, they’re going o get them anyway they can, they’re not afraid of USA, Russia, Israel or anyone else because they simply don’t care how many of their own are Killed. The Iranian Regime can “Push the Button” from anywhere in the world, so they’re SAFE, screw the Fodder left “In Country”, they’ll be used as Media Attractions, the way HAMAS uses civilians by by declaring a Curfew, so the people can’t escape when Israel retaliates a HAMAS Rocket…..

      • You’re right, Pepe… I think halevi and I agree on the substance. His disagreement is that by saying Baraq is getting his clock cleaned I’m mistakenly implying that Baraq is actually TRYING to do the right thing and keep our enemy from nukes. halevi applies negative motive to Baraq’s “efforts” and I have to admit… he may well be correct.

      • Obama and Kerry are simply not smart/shrewd enough for high level negotiations.Most thinking Americans are deeply worried.

    • WE are extremely happy! We are not full of fear or believe the lies and myths that are put out …I don’t know how you LOONS function on a daily basis with all the fear you carry

      • We’re individuals so it is tough to answer for the rest of the LOONS. This one does it by blocking our a few minutes each day and mocking pajama boy p*$$he’s like you and trying to remind the Boehner/McConnell ilk that they used to be vertebrates.

    • the oh so foolish libs were thrilled with the Arab Spring,how peace was just around the corner,etc,etc,.They’re always wrong about everything. Americans are so weary of all the chaos and decline under Obama.

  3. How is it that one man can do his bidding in the name of our republic ? I won’t resort to name calling in regards to the president but I am seeing some true cowards that make up the body that represents the people of this country. Among the many things going out the window is our pride! Fix it before the cost is so high that our children will bear the responsibility.

  4. Its another political gambit, sell it as a good deal thru the liberal media and call those who oppose it war mongers. Create a moral high ground and then dig in.

  5. Do you think he possibly thinks like the Iranians and wants to usher in the 12th Imam? I know they are working hard toward that outcome, maybe Obama is working to make that happen as well? It would explain why he is siding with Iran.

      • After the “you can keep your doctor… keep your current plan… period” lie and the passing of Obamacare with “pass it to see what’s in it…” and the results of the unilateral immigration memorandum and other secret deals, the American people don’t trust this administration and don’t want to find out what the deal is after the fact.

        When bad deals are signed, especially secret deals, it’s always hard to get that genie back into the bottle after it has been let out. All this secrecy and lack of transparency leads to distrust of government.

      • I made my comments 4 hours before you commented on them. Are you assuming [a] that your comments somehow changed my view when they didn’t or [b] that a comment I wrote 4 hours earlier would be altered by a comment you made 4 hours later? That doesn’t make sense. Believe me, I’m not going to edit and earlier comment to suit your narrative when I don’t agree with it.

      • You’re not making sense.
        I know you made your comment four hours before I responded to them.
        My response here was in direct response to the comment you wrote in this conversation.

      • The fact that negotiations are ongoing is a disgrace. Why is this country trying to make a deal with TERRORISTS who want to DESTROY AMERICA??? STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES. OBOZO IS A COWARD AND A TRAITOR.

      • You think negotiating is a disgrace?
        Do you not know what diplomacy is and what our presidents are supposed to do?
        Did you call Reagan a traitor when he negotiated arms reduction with the Soviets

      • Brendan….that was a totally different scenario….Russia already had nukes and didn’t proclaim “Death to Americans” at every turn….WAKE UP MORON….IRAN wants to destroy the United States and Israel….and is also the main supporter of TERRORISTS through the world…SO WHY ARE WE NEGOTIATION WITH TERRORIST???

      • We are in negotiations with the government of a sovereign nation recognized by all other nations.
        And we are in negotiations to STOP them from getting nuclear weapons.

        You’re telling me that as an officer in the Navy you don’t know that we negotiate with foreign governments.

      • Let me try and make this very clear. When a country negotiates,,,that country is expected to negotiate from strength not weakness…OBOZO removed sanctions that brought IRAN to the negotiating table and now we are negotiating thru weakness….OBOZO is a COWARD, LIAR, and cares little about our countries allies…All he wants to do is say that he negotiated a deal with IRAN…regardless of how bad the deal was….Consequently, OBOZO is a TRAITOR who should be tried for TREASON… Do you actually think that IRAN who kicked out the U.N. inspectors last time will grant them access to sensitive areas this time??? IF YOU DO THEN YOU ARE DRINKING THE KOOLAID….IRAN cannot be trusted …consequently…we should not negotiate with them….If it walks like a duck..it if quacks like a duck…if it looks like a duck…it probably is a duck…DUH….

      • You are a clown. You are calling the President a traitor for something you imagine will happen in the future.
        You know nothing of diplomacy.

      • I’m calling our COWARD in CHIEF a TRAITOR because he released 5 high level TERRORISTS for a DESERTER who collaborated with the enemy. MOREOVER, he allowed top secret documents to be declassified so they could be released to our enemies. OBOZO says he will leave no American behind yet what about the Americans that were beheaded by ISIS TERRORISTS??? Don’t think any deals were made for their release. What about the transparency of this wonderful deal with IRAN??? When are we going to see the deal? I know…we have to sign it before we know what is in it??? Sound familiar??? I know quite abit about diplomacy….and this isn’t it. OBOZO has made this country the laughing stock of the world….Nobody trusts us…while every one is laughing at our incompetence. OBOZO THE CLOWN …ENOUGH SAID!!!

      • You only continue to show how little you know about diplomacy.
        Every phase of negotiations is not made public.
        Deals are made public and often reviewed by Congress before being finalized… but every step of negotiations is not made public.

        Your demand to know what is being negotiated before any deal is even considered is absurd and out of touch.

        Your Bergdahl rant is equally out of touch.
        If you are an officer, you know that we bring back our own… even deserters.
        And while i agree that five for one was a bad trade, don’t pretend prisoner exchanges are something you never heard of.

        And your Assumption that nothing was done to help Americans is unfounded.

        America’s reputation is fine… the growing movement of wacko conspiracy nuts, however, is causing embarrassment.

      • And if they were getting a good deal, wouldn’t they be all over the media attempting to get kudos for it. You know, like Bergdahl’s parents in the Rose Garden, Obama bragging about what he accomplished. It’s only secret because it can’t stand the light of day – the entire world would be screaming in disapproval if we were told the truth.

  6. Since Allen West’s crazy predictions about what Obama will do next always turn out to be the opposite of what happens, this means that we will probably get a great deal.

      • I base my opinion on what actually happens… Mr West reports on his most dire predictions not what has actually happened.
        No deal with Iran has been set… negotiations are still on going.
        Could this all fall apart?
        Mr West, however, is predicting that Obama will make a deal that gives up everything and gets nothing.
        Mr West also predicted that Obama would somehow not allow Bergdahl to be investigated… when that was proven wrong, Mr West predicted that Obama would not allow Berdahl to face a court martial.
        That was also wrong.

        Virtually every prediction he has made of Obama has been wrong.

        This current prediction is baseless.
        He cites an anti=Obama website that also makes a baseless prediction as his supporting evidence.
        It is essentially a few people sharing the same beliefs citing each other as proof that their beliefs are sound.

      • Multiple sources are saying Obama pushed the Army to offer Bergdahl a plea deal in exchange for an extremely lenient sentence so that this scandal would quietly disappear. These sources are saying that Bergdahl flatly refused the plea deal. So, if these sources are right, there was an effort to cover up this embarrassment for Obama and we wouldn’t have heard anything about Bergdahl, except for the sentencing and some excuses about why it was so light (his health, some mental health problem, sypathy for his harsh treatment after he joined the Taliban, etc…).

      • Actually no.
        multiple websites, like this one, are repeating the false narrative that they believe Obama is pressuring the military.
        None of them, not a single one, has shown a single piece of evidence to support that accusation.

        And the unfolding events have proven every one of those accusations wrong.
        …like all the anti-Obama opinion websites (like this one) saying there would be no charges because of the administration

        Any plea deal that was offered was offered by the military and since it is completely normal for prosecutors (civilian and military) to offer deals before going to trial, there is zero evidence that the administration was involved.
        Nothing was unusual about offering a plea before proceeding to trial.

      • Blaa blaa same thing over and over Brendan. Can’t you find another site to give your wonderful insights to? Your becoming very boring with the same old boring negative remarks.

      • Well troll… if all you have is insults and you can’t stand discussing facts, don’t partake in the conversation.
        You posted nothing in this discussion other than insults and are offended that you are not getting a more detailed response?

      • Ha, your so funny! Nobody likes you or haven’t you noticed? Nobody agrees with you and you just like getting a reaction. You think you contribute to the conversation, we just laugh at you.

      • Facts aren’t decided by popularity and it is no surprise that a bunch of Allen West’s worshipers don’t like me for pointing out his errors.
        I don’t care about being popular. I’m just here to try to save ignorant cult members

        And as usual kid… all you bring is insults.
        Have you ever brought any piece of information into a discussion or do you just hurl insults at anyone who speaks ill of your messiah?

      • Number one do NOT call me kid. I am insulting you Brendan, your just here to point out Mr. West’s worshipers all his errors. Your trying to save ignorant cult members. My messiah? Who do you think you are? Your going to save all off us from confusion and we should believe in all your wisdom and think like you do? Now, who is full of themselves?

      • Sorry kid… as long as you have nothing to offer to the discussion other than childish insults, you’re just a kid.

        You began your conversation with me by hurling childish insults in response to my criticism of Mr West.
        Do you have anything to say to rebuke those points I made earlier… or are you just a kid throwing childish insults?

      • And you weren’t throwing childish insults calling us names? Your boring me Brendan, see you on your next bashing of Mr. West articles. I’ll catch up with you then.

      • Sure, here’s a few….

        Allen West predicted Obama would not allow Bergdahl to face charges.
        There was no interference and Bergdahl is facing a court martial.

        Allen West predicted that Obama would be badly defeated in the 2012 election.
        Obama won.

        Allen West predicted that the Benghazi investigation by the House committee on intelligence would bring charges against Obama and even referenced phony evidence he claimed to have.

        The investigation cleared Obama of wrong doing and West has stopped talking about the secret surprise evidence he had.

    • The whole world is on fire and the feckless One has the United States of America sitting in the cheap seats while it happens. The Greek columns and soaring rhetoric seem a distant memory to all but you who worship him like a god.

      Unfortunately, you make up about 35% of the voting public. Even more unfortunately, those we elected to oppose you are timid little door mats. As such, rather than entertaining little pajama-boy punching bags you are dangerous. Each passing day brings us closer to the reckoning.

  7. It is not caving when it is an intentional act of offering aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States…it is an act of treason.

  8. Obama helps our enemies and stabs our allies in the back. The one revolution Obama failed to support in the Middle East, was the one that wasn’t backed by radical Islamists.

    If Obama’s not a closet Muslim, why does he always support Islamists?

    And what kind of Moron believes the lies put forth by Iran? Right, Obama.

      • Yet, in your abject idiocy, you can’t show where.

        Face it, you’re an Obama sycophant who would kiss his arse given the chance and a moron to boot.

      • I can’t show where?
        None of what you wrote is true.
        It is not on me to disprove a negative.
        You made a crazy accusation with no proof…. prove it.

        If I say there is a giant elephant living on the moon, it is not up to you to prove my claim is false… it is up to me to prove it is true.

        So back up your crazy claims


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here