Obama avoids congratulating Netanyahu on victory

Well I guess we no longer have to pretend whose side Obama is on anymore.

This morning, White House aide David Simas went to great lengths to avoid congratulating Benjamin Netanyahu on his sweeping victory last night.

Instead, he could only manage to congratulate the Israeli people.

Aside from Obama, I’m sure you can also add Iran, Syria, Hezbollah, ISIS, al-Qaida and Boko Haram to the list of those not congratulating Netanyahu.

But I bet Jordan’s King Abdullah and Egypt’s President El-Sisi are breathing sighs of relief.

I know I am.

283 COMMENTS

  1. You have to wonder how obama missed demanding that the chads be checked. Netanyahu would certainly have lost if obama could have gotten the new black panthers in there.

  2. Obama had no problem congratulating Putin!! Obama is sucking lemons today…
    God Bless Israel!! They have voted freedom and protection against evil and Bibi is the man to give it to them!!

  3. I quit my previous job and today I get paid $85 per hour. Wondering How? I work over internet! My last work was bad for me ,so I chose to take my chance on something new… Two years have passed since And I can say it was the best decision I ever made! Check it out, what i do… -> –>Learn more here <-

  4. I can’t remember anytime in history where we had an illegal, muslim for a president….can you? Can anyone put the pieces of our country back together again?

      • Your kidding or blind to what is happening in the nation and to our allies. Or perhaps your just stupid.

      • No… you’re living in a paranoid fantasy.
        You don’t have to like Obama.
        But believing he is a Muslim and/or an illegal is just delusional.

        To paraphrase you… you would have to be blind or stupid to believe those ridiculous conspiracies.
        Do you also believe the moon landing was fake?

      • Not paranoid at all Brendan, just stating the truth and the obvious! Too bad you aren’t well read! Whatever Brendan, I guess we will find out soon now won’t we?

      • Jennifer Psaki: “Yes, we are comfortable doing business with the Muslim Brotherhood.”
        February 2, 2015

      • Phony quotes don’t help your cause.
        She never sad that.
        A right wing blog made up that quote in their headline in a story where a state department spokesman said she had no problem doing business with a center at Georgetown university even though there were people associated with the MB who attended a conference there.

        Wow… that sure proves your paranoid fantasy that Obama is a Muslim illegal…right?

      • When you read this you will understand why Obama refuses to say the words “radical Islam.”.. We now have a Muslim government? John Brennan, current head of CIA converted to Islam while stationed in Saudi Arabia. Obama’s top advisor, Valerie Jarrett, is a Muslim who was born in Iran where her parents still live. Hillary Clinton’s top advisor, Huma Abedin is a Muslim, whose mother and brother are involved in the now outlawed Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt. Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for Homeland Security, Arif Aikhan, is a Muslim. Homeland Security Advisor, Mohammed Elibiary, is a Muslim. Obama advisor and founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council, Salam al-Marayati, is a Muslim. Obama’s Sharia Czar, Imam Mohamed Magid, of the Islamic Society of North America is a Muslim. Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships, Eboo Patel, is a Muslim. And last but not least, our closet Muslim himself, Barack Hussein Obama. It’s questionable if Obama ever officially took the oath of office when he was sworn in. He didn’t repeat the oath properly to defend our nation and our Constitution. Later the Democrats claimed he was given the oath again in private? CIA director John Brennan took his oath on a copy of the Constitution, not a Bible. Congressman, Keith Ellison took his oath on a copy of the Qur’an. Congresswoman Michele Bachman was vilified and almost tarred and feathered by Democrats when she voiced her concern about Muslims taking over our government. Considering all these appointments, it would explain why Obama and his minions are systematically destroying our nation, supporting radical Muslim groups worldwide, opening our southern border, and turning a blind eye to the genocide being perpetrated on Christians all over Africa and the Middle East. The more damage Obama does, the more arrogant he’s become! Our nation and our government has been infiltrated by people who want to destroy us. It can get worse or better depending on ” we the people”. Its up to us to prevent Marshal Law before the next election. Feel free to press on comment, copy and share

      • Oh No!
        There are Muslim Americans serving in government.
        And you see that as proof that Obama is a Muslim.
        There are many more Christians in the administration so, by your own logic, isn’t that proof he is Christian?

        Also Congressman Keith Ellison is an elected Congressman, not an Obama appointee.

        And your conspiracy theory about Obama not swearing the oath is just flat out false.

      • Brendan, you have no idea what you are saying….wait and see little guy. Time will tell. Meanwhile you keep drinking that kool aid. Haven’t you noticed that 99% of the people on this posting agree with me not you? Go away kid, you bother me. Come back when you clear your brain.

      • 99%?
        wow
        Don’t assume that just because you are on a rabid anti-Obama website that they all think he’s a secret Muslim… many do… but that’s because of where you are.

  5. O__O there’s my look of surprise.
    I expected nothing LESS of that worthless moslem in the oval office, or his minions puking their racist hatred towards Israel.

      • Past acts and now words (or lack thereof)
        Just a simple example……..
        Having a hissy fit that Bibi was willing to talk to a BI-PARTISAN meeting in congress.
        Having closed negotiations with iran, (keeping Israel out) KNOWING they will nuke Israel if given half the chance.
        Taking hezbolla OFF the terror list even though they CONTINUE to terrorize Israel.
        Sening an iranian’s father in law to negotiate with the iranian government.
        Is that enough??

      • No… negotiating with Iran to get them to stop their nuclear program is not anti-Israel.
        …and disagreeing with Bibi is not the same as being anti-Israel any more than disagreeing with Obama is anti-American.

        I do, however, agree that the director of national intelligence not including Hezbollah on the terror list is wrong and I want to know more about the President’s involvement in that decision.

      • However keeping Israel out of the “loop” on what is being allowed is suspicious at best. Since iran has made it perfectly clear that they will blow Israel off the map if given the chance, it would be prudent and wise of our government to keep our ally in the loop of what is going on.

      • i agree. I would hope that they are keeping Israel informed.
        because of Iran’s unmoving hatred for Israel, I would think that keeping Israel informed is probably being done secretly so as not to push Iran away from the talks.
        But I do agree with you… keeping Israel informed is important.

        Also, i learned yesterday that Hizballah was not actually removed from the list of terrorist organizations.
        The story about them being removed from the list is false.
        James Clapper omitted them from a report he submitted on terrorist threats… but the US government still lists Hizballah on its list of foreign terrorist organizations.

        here is a link to the actual list on the State Department’s website…
        http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/other/des/123085.htm

      • http://rt.com/news/241237-obama-netanyahu-senate-israel/

        The US Senate has launched a bipartisan probe into the White House’s alleged funding of an NGO pushing for the ouster of Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, a source told Fox News.

        According to the source, the US State Department apparently handed taxpayer-funded grants, worth $350,000, to the OneVoice Movement.

        OneVoice allegedly forwarded the money to its subsidiary in Israel called Victory 15 (V15), which is committed to ousting Netanyahu due to the PM being an obstacle to the two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, brokered by the US.

        “It’s confirmed that there is a bipartisan Permanent Subcommittee inquiry into OneVoice’s funding of V15,” the source said.

        OneVoice is prohibited from directly targeting Netanyahu by US law and can only do it through its Israeli partner, V15.

        According to Fox News, V15 is “itself guided by top operatives of Obama’s White House,” with Jeremy Bird, who was Obama’s deputy national campaign director in 2008 and national field director in 2012, arriving in Israel to direct the group.

        There’s been no confirmation from a US Senate investigatory committee, which is a body with subpoena powers, that such a probe is under way.

      • Obama meddled in a sovereign nations affairs. He is anti Bibi which makes him anti Israel since Bibi is their leader. Your corrupt and anti Semitic POTUS should be impeached.

        Funny how you little pussies cried about a letter the GOP sent to Iran citing our Constitution, yet suck Obama’s balls when he violates the Constitution.

      • So you are anti-America by your own logic.
        you said…
        [[He is anti Bibi which makes him anti Israel since Bibi is their leader.]]

        So you are saying everyone, including you, who is anti-Obama must also be anti-America.

      • LOL retard! Bibi doesn’t run this nation, does he? I personally don’t care how Bibi runs his nation. Are you a career idiot?

      • you said that opposing a nation’s leader was the same as opposing the nation… so I’m only following your logic.
        It’s no surprise that you disagree with yourself.

      • Wrong Brenda. I said a POTUS meddling in a foreign election trying to oust a sitting leader smacks of hatred for that leader. I know you;re good at stealing things in life like valor but you’ll have to try and steal another thread. So why do you support Obama undermining the elections of a sovereign nation and an ally? I wonder what it is about Bibi that Obama hates. We already know Obama funds terrorists who want to kill Israelis so what’s going on Brenda?

  6. Congratulations Israel you got a real president!!! We got a Lying worthless scumbag !!! Can we borrow your president he’s so much better then Obola liar in chief and muslIim sympathizer Traitor to America . We apologize for the sympathizer piece of crap calling his self our presiden we are ashamed of our government!!!

      • Then take a phhukkin walk and go elsewhere. You’ve been on the rahg over this for two days now. GTFOH if it upsets you that much. Whatsamatta Jew hater? Bibi and the GOP beat your BOY Obama

      • You think Bibi and the GOP beat Obama?
        Obama wasn’t running for election in Israel.
        By your reasoning, they also beat Bush, Reagan, Lincoln, and Clinton too.

      • [[ You think Bibi and the GOP beat Obama? ]]

        Sure. You leftard slime had a hard-on for Bibi since he came here to speak. And your ape POS POTUS tried to influence the election.

      • It wasn’t just Israel’s left-wing parties that lost big as part of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s dramatic victory yesterday. Team Obama, which pulled as many strings as it could to defeat Netanyahu, was embarrassed.
        It had dispatched Jeremy Bird, the architect of the grass-roots and online organizing efforts behind both of Obama’s presidential campaign, to Israel to work the same magic there with a group called Victory 15.

        Victory 15 was in turn a close ally of the One Voice Movement — a U.S. tax-exempt organization with a subsidiary in Israel that actively worked against Netanyahu. One Voice apparently used $350,000 in State Department grants to to fund its anti-Netanyahu efforts in direct contravention with U.S. law.

        Expect a congressional investigation of the “dark money” the U.S. government may have indirectly spent in Israel.

        Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/JohnFund/israel-netanyahu-election-hillary/2015/03/18/id/630817/#ixzz3Ul9Lmr94
        Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. Vote Here Now!

      • They don’t have to. We all know it was. That’s why The Meddler hasn’t called to congratulate Bibi.

      • oh dear…still leaking that sore of yours…Bibi won, the leader of the free world won. The conservative surge is on the ascendancy. Deal with it.

        Go lick that stinky wound of yours somewhere else….pathetic

    • Yes I do know his was elected Prime Minister Again for the 7th time. Did you notice I did not say he was elected president? I said they got a
      ( Real President) meaning what we have couldn’t hold a candle to him . The mistake I made was not saying Could we borrow your Prime Minister as our President?? The one we have is a coward a liar and traitor. Your Prime Minster makes our president look like the spinless , worthless scumbag he is!!! Did that clear this up for you Douchebag? ?

    • Yes, I agree. It feels good to know that goodness wins. And an adult with a normal heart and mind rules in the Middle East.

  7. Obama is such a petty little boy, such an embarrassment. I happened to listen to Netanyahu’s speech to Congress last night, and he couldn’t have been more gracious to Obama and thanking him when he didn’t have to. Obama is such a narcissist that he can’t handle that #1 – Netanyahu came to speak and #2 – that he (Netanyahu) got a stamp of approval from his country. This next year and 9 months (a long term pregnancy for sure) is going to be painful as we wait for this baby to leave. But, I PRAY that Netanyahu’s reelection will be a sign to Congress that everything MUST be done to keep Islam away from nuclear weapons. Something Obama doesn’t seem too concerned about. Because remember Islam to him is just – sweet, innocent, peace and love. He is WRONG.

    • Obama does take a nuclear Iran as a threat… that is why he is trying to negotiate with them to stop it from happening.
      The politicians that don’t care about a nuclear Iran are the ones trying to sabotage those negotiations.

      • Obama is too naively supportive of their Islamic government. He has downplayed ALL the destruction Islam is causing in the world. So, our assumption is that he is downplaying the danger in Iran is as well. And that is a threat to us all.

      • If he didn’t see the threat, he wouldn’t be negotiating.

        And Obama does not downplay the destruction caused by radicals all around the world.. .he speaks about it often.
        He just doesn’t blame all of Islam for it

      • Obama is a loser and sympathetic to terrorists, has no ability to do anything except rule as a dictator…not the American way, and we will pay dearly for every mistake, that this idiot has made !

      • A legally elected President is not a dictator… and killing terrorists around the world is not sympathizing with them

      • That comment doesn’t make sense.
        When has he bowed to mullahs?

        Are you referring to following protocol and bowing when greeting foreign leaders of certain cultures?

        And as to funding hamas and the MB.. the only time that happened was when Hamas was elected to run Palestine and the MB was elected to run Egypt.. .and we had aid packages already in place to those countries.
        Nice try

      • Obama is a bowing Muslim lover. Deal with it.

        Now respond to this…………..’ Funding Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood is what?’

      • Again… you didn’t read my comment.
        The united States has foreign Aid money set aside each year for both Palestine and Egypt… money that was set aside BEFORE Hamas won the election in Palestine and BEFORE the Muslim Brotherhood won the election in Egypt.
        There was no new or additional money.
        All that our government did was continue to honor pre existing aid agreements with those two countries.

        Some nuts have distorted those simple facts into saying Obama funded hamas and the MB… so go ahead…did Obama give money to Hamas or the Mb that was not part of the pre determined (BY CONGRESS) aid packages for Palestine and Egypt?
        If you have a single example to show that, I’d love to see it.

      • So Obama can use his pen and phone to stop a GOP Congress but not stops funds going to terrorists. Thanks for the clarification.

      • Legally still hasn’t been proven, the birth certificate was never authenticated, plus he is guilty of undermining the constitution with Obama care. we impeached Clinton for a BJ we should have had him impeached oh yeah the patriot act prevents us from getting that started cause any one trying will get a suspected terrorist tag.

      • Yes, it was proven.
        Your argument is as ridiculous as saying the moon landing still hasn’t been proven

      • Would it help you to understand that the hospital cited on his birth record didn’t exist when he was born????

      • A POTUS who acts like a dictator and violates his oath of office and the U.S. Constitution IS a dictator. You are a blind fool if you can’t see that.

      • You read imaginary words that aren’t there.
        No.. obama is not breaking the law.
        Your failure to understand the law is your problem.
        And you keep avoiding my question which tells me you don’t thing a nuclear Iran is a threat

      • You keep saying it but you have nothing to support that, other than your own failure to understand the meaning of the words “intervene” and “internal.”

      • I’ve supported it many times.

        Point I: Non-Intervention in Iranian Affairs

        1. The United States pledges that it is and from now on will be the policy of the United

        States not to intervene, directly or indirectly, politically or militarily, in Iran’s internal affairs

        Uranium enrichment is their internal affair.

      • Exactly… and negotiating with their government is not intervening in internal affairs.

        I also like how you again think a nuclear Iran is not an external threat.
        i guess you are calling Netanyahu a liar

      • Actually no… had he funded a political party in Iran, THAT would have been a violation of the Algiers Accords

      • Article 2 Section 2 of the Constitution:

        The president shall have power by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur.

        Obama broke the Constitution by making an agreement with Iran without consent of Senate…..

      • That’s incorrect.
        Obama has made no agreement.
        negotiations are not finalized agreements.
        And i agree.. any deal needs to go through the Senate before being finalized

      • You may want to check the history of the conversation you are jumping in on.

        Andy is defending Iran, saying their nuclear program is an internal matter, not an external threat.
        I am saying that Iran’s nuclear development is an external threat to their neighbors and the world.

        So please… tell me how I am ignorant for saying Iran is a threat and why you are defending him that Iran is not.
        Or next time take the time to read the full conversation history before jumping in.

      • More insight. And because he does take Iran seriously, he removed them from the Terror list, huh??????

      • if obama had a spine he would NOT negotiate.he would demand they stop producing on penalty of getting the hell bombed out of them..Of course that other coward fake john kerry has no balls either.

      • Really?
        So if we could negotiate with Iran and halt their production… you think that is not as good an idea as going to war again and further destabilizing the world, not to mention costing thousands of American lives.

      • If you believe Obama is trying to stop Iran from getting the bomb, you are clearly showing your partisan bias and not thinking clearly at all.

      • Why would I believe otherwise.
        Our administration is negotiating to stop their nuclear production.
        How is that NOT trying to stop Iran from having a bomb?

      • Have you taken a serious look at all that Obama has done wrong in the ME? What has he done right??

      • Today or 10 years from now doesn’t matter. Allowing those Iranian nuts to develop nukes ensures that they will be used against Israel and the U.S. Rouhani does not control Iran. The mullahs do. They hate us, and they will not abide by any agreement that Rouhani agrees to. Only a fool believes they would.

  8. I love Dick Cheney. He tells it like it is: “I look at Barack Obama and I see the worst president in my lifetime, without question—and that’s saying something. I used to have significant criticism of Jimmy Carter, but compared to Barack Obama and the damage he is doing to the nation—it’s a tragedy, a real tragedy, and we are going to pay a hell of a price just trying to dig out from under his presidency,”

      • No, Dick Cheney did everything in his power to protect and serve THIS COUNTRY. That was his first priority. We KNOW that is not Obama’s. I look at your posts, and I highly doubt you are a veteran. Most liberals are posers and try and act like they are patriotic. When they are not.

      • Of course you doubt my service… because it doesn’t fit in with your narrow beliefs.
        Dick Cheney pushing for war in Iraq with no plan for the reconstruction or occupation, at the expense of thousands of American lives and destabiizing the region for decades to come was not protecting this country

      • Congress, Colin Powell, the UN APPROVED that war. And the war was WON. Until Obama decided to remove all troops. And a complete annihilation of the people there has occurred. My father was a Pearl Harbor Veteran and knew sacrifice. We have the greatest military in the world for a reason. It is to ensure our power and to stop evil. Obama doesn’t see a need for either.

      • You clearly weren’t paying attention for the past decade.

        Yes… we kicked ass in Iraq and delivered a military victory.
        But we went on false intelligence and we went without a plan for the occupation… an occupation that cost more than 10 times as many American lives as the invasion.

        We destabilized the entire region and created chaos… and the timetable for withdrawal was arranged by Bush, not Obama

      • That is a lie. Bush PLEADED with the UN to KEEP TROOPS IN IRAQ, You liberals are just in complete denial. What is your problem?! If you would take a closer look at Obama and maybe get off the drugs you would see he is an utter wreck for this country. He does NOT act in our best interest and has ruined all the work that was done in Iraq. There is TERRIBLE SUFFERING GOING ON RIGHT NOW because Obama refuses to listen to military generals who told him to NOT WITHDRAW from Iraq.

      • Wrong
        You are 100% wrong.
        The 2011 deadline for withdrawing all US troops from iraq was set by President Bush in December of 2008.

        And Obama did try to negotiate with the Iraqi government to keep troops there but the Iraqis would not allow it unless US troops could be prosecuted by Iraqi law and have their immunity stripped.
        that was the deal breaker

      • You are in complete denial. I listened to at least a dozen military generals who said they advised Obama to keep troops there and he didn’t. Iraq has been BEGGING for our help, and this loser refuses to send any. I am done with you. And I don’t believe you served. Or at least, served proudly.

      • You are in complete denial.
        Yes… they advised him to keep troops there but he couldn’t.
        WHY?
        Because BUSH signed an agreement to withdraw buy the end of 2011.
        Obama tried to keep troops there but the Iraqi government refused to allow American troops to have immunity form Iraqi courts.
        That was the deal breaker.

        Here is a neutral news article from the BBC back in 2011 during the withdrawal… it is short.. read the whole thing, especially the last line.

        http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-16234723

      • And unfortunately, I have paid VERY CLOSE attention to Obama. And I KNOW VERY WELL ALL THE LIES DECEIT and DESTRUCTION he has caused. I do research rather than rely on his PR FIRM (aka the mainstream media) to inform.

      • Really?
        What did I write that was a lie?
        We didn’t win on the ground?
        We didn’t invade on false information?
        The occupation wasn’t bungled and didn’t cost ten times as many American lives?
        The timetable for withdrawal wasn’t set by Bush?

        Go ahead… what did I write that was a lie?

      • HAHAHA
        you want me to link all my personal information for a stalker like you to see?
        What else do you want?
        My Social Security Number, Date of Birth, Mother’s Maiden Name?
        HAHAHA

      • And what reason do you have to doubt him? Bearing in mind that your track record isn’t very good at this sort of thing.

      • I’ve called out about five guys. You’re the only one who produced. Or do you believe everything you read on the net.

      • If someone says they served then I believe them until they give me a reason not to. Fakers are usually pretty easy to spot if you’re familiar with the particular military culture. I’m familiar with the Army infantry because that’s the branch I served in and so did Brendan. Nothing he’s said has sent up any red flags to me.

      • Well good for you Paul! Have you met Brenda or do you take his word for it because you have similar politics?

      • I take his word for it because I believe people until they give me a reason not to. Which is what the message you just replied to says in the very first sentence.
        You should examine your own motivations for questioning his service though. And for questioning mine. Is it because we have different politics?

      • I question anyone who tries to shutdown discussion with idiotic retorts like ‘when did you serve?’ So if someone hasn’t served they can’t discuss the military or war? If someone plays that card with me I will tell them to put up or shut up. Do people have discussions on many issues of the day but yet have no firsthand experience with them? Of course. And no one told you that you had to serve, did they?

      • So the person you should be questioning then is marnold1966 who wrote
        “Neither Brendan nor Majorwiblit have ever served, so they know nothing.”
        But instead you’re attacking Brendan who hasn’t said anything of the sort except in response to your accusations against him.

      • I don’t have to question anyone. I’m talking to you. How old are you anyway? You keep records of what other posters say that hut your feelings? You sleeping with Brenda? Or is that your sock? I answered your questions so take it or leave it. Your punk flung his ‘service’ at me so I responded. Move on Paula.

      • You know how old I am. It’s on the DD214, dipstick.
        I remember what’s been said on this thread without needing to take notes, it’s only a page or two.
        I’m just looking for some of that consistency you’re always asking other people to show. When and where did he fling his service at you? All I’ve seen is him responding to people who claim (with no basis whatsoever) that he can’t be a veteran because he doesn’t agree with them.

      • I don’t give a phhukk how old you are Paula. My point is you;re acting like a whiny kid. Now if my answers bother you, ignore them and give Brenda a hug, unless you are Brenda.

      • I’m treating you like an adult. I haven’t questioned your age or who you claim to be. You are the one who seems incapable of discussion without resorting to playground behavior.
        So if you’re done dodging the question, when and where did Brendan fling his service at you?

      • You’re whimpering like a child. I answered your question. Get over it. Get over me slapping your pretend soldier…….or you sock………… around. Now research our exchanges if you want to see where he/you flung his service around Paula/Brenda.

      • [[ Yes… we kicked ass in Iraq and delivered a military victory ]]

        Not you Brenda. You were still in diapers.

      • How do you destabilize an unstable region??? They always have been, and always will be an unstable region. Their hatred of all things not Islamic ensures their instability.

      • How many did Bill Clinton get? And he was a POTUS sending others to die. And when did Obama serve? Now G F Y.

      • What service have you ever done for this nation? Stealing valor and sucking ISIS pole isn’t serving the USA punk.

      • Sorry Andy.
        i know you have your excuses why you didn’t serve… and you still post weird homosexual things about me and ISIS… but I fought for this country while you made excuses why you wouldn’t

      • Put up your DD 214 Brenda.

        I made no excuses for not wanting to go to Nam. The war ended along with the draft when I turned 18. No one in their right mind wanted to go to Nam. But unlike your lying ass, I have no problem being honest about it. I don’t need to lie about serving to feel a sense of manhood. So put up or shut up.

      • Oh… so you didn’t enlist because the war was over?
        I guess you don’t value service unless there is a war happening.
        And sorry kid… i’m not posting my DD214 with all my personal information on a public forum just so a crazy stalker troll like you can call it fake anyway.

      • Yep. I had no interest in enlisting just like you. And you don’t have a DD 214 child. At least Paul Sheridan emailed me his when I asked to see it. So where’s yours liar?

      • Glad to see you’re still being your insightful self today. That is sarcasm, in case you don’t recognize it like so many other things.

      • Pushed us into a war based on false intelligence that cost thousands of American lives and made the threat of terrorism worse

      • He did?

        Democrat Quotes on Iraq Weapons of Mass Destruction
        “One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line.”
        –President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

        “If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
        –President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

        “Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face.”
        –Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

        “He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
        –Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

        “[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs.”
        Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
        — Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

        “Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
        -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

        “Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”
        — Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

        “There is no doubt that … Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”
        Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
        — Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

        “We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them.”
        — Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

        “We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
        — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

        “Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.”
        — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

        “We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
        — Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

        “The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…”
        — Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

        “I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”
        — Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

        “There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years … We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.”
        — Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

        “He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do”
        — Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

        “In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
        — Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

        “We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.”
        — Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

        “Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime … He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation … And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction … So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real…”
        — Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

      • HAHAHA
        So?
        Did that make the intel that Bush used real?
        Also most of those quotes are from Senators speaking about Intel that Bush provided that turned out to be false.

      • You said it was Cheney who stated the drumbeat for war. I proved you wrong.

        And look at the dates moron. Many of them are before 911.

      • Learn to read dolt… most of those were after 9/11.
        And your childish two wrongs make a right argument doesn’t hold water.
        Cheney pushed for war… not Clinton

      • Learn to stop sucking lib dikk punk.

        Your libtards thought there were WMD. Deal with it. And Clinton was responsible for 911.

      • The fake soldier is now projecting his pole smoking fantasies.

        Clinton admitted not killing OBL when he could have in 1998. Not dead OBL=911. Clinton also refused to take OBL from Sudan a few years earlier. Clinton also knew about Project Bojinka that revealed plans to use planes to take our buildings down. He did nothing. I guess you and Slick have something in common. You both suck Muslim knob.

      • 9/11 was set in motion years in advance.
        Bush did nothing against al qaeda prior to 9/11 and ignored warnings

        Beginning on Aug. 7, 1998, the day that al Qaeda destroyed the U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Clinton directed a campaign of increasing scope and lethality against bin Laden’s network that carried through his final days in office.

        • In addition to a secret “finding” to authorize covert action, which has been reported before, Clinton signed three highly
        classified Memoranda of Notification expanding theavailable tools. In succession, the president authorized killing instead of capturing bin Laden, then added several of al Qaeda’s senior lieutenants, and finally approved theshooting down of private civilian aircraft on which they flew.

        • The Clinton administration ordered the Navy to maintain two Los Angeles-class attack submarines on permanent station in the nearest available waters, enabling the U.S. military to place Tomahawk cruise missiles on any target in Afghanistan within about six hours of receiving the order.

        • Three times after Aug. 20, 1998, when Clinton ordered the only missile strike of his presidency against bin Laden’s
        organization,the CIA came close enough to pinpointing bin Laden that Clinton authorized final preparations to launch. In each case, doubts about the intelligence aborted the mission.

        • The CIA’s directorate of operations recruited, trained, paid or equipped surrogate forces in Pakistan, Uzbekistan and among tribal militias inside Afghanistan, with the common purpose of capturing or killing bin Laden. The Pakistani channel, disclosed previously in The Washington Post, and its Uzbek counterpart, which has not been reported before, never bore fruit. Inside Afghanistan, tribal allies twice reported to their CIA handlers that they fought skirmishes with bin Laden’s forces, but they inflicted no verified damage.

        • Operatives of the CIA’s Special Activities Division made at least one clandestine entry into Afghanistan in 1999. They
        prepareda desert airstrip to extract bin Laden, if captured, or to evacuate U.S. tribal allies, if cornered. The Special Collection Service, a jointproject of the CIA and the National Security Agency, also slipped into Afghanistan to place listening devices within range of al Qaeda’s tactical radios.

      • IT was perhaps the most famous presidential briefing in history.
        On Aug. 6, 2001, President George W. Bush received a classified review of the threats posed by Osama bin Laden and his terrorist network, Al Qaeda. That morning’s “presidential daily brief” — the top-secret document prepared by America’s intelligence agencies — featured the now-infamous heading: “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.”

        A few weeks later, on 9/11, Al Qaeda accomplished that goal.

        And the C.I.A. repeated the warnings in the briefs that followed. Operatives connected to Bin Laden, one reported on June 29, expected the planned near-term attacks to have “dramatic consequences,” including major casualties. On July 1, the brief stated that the operation had been delayed, but “will occur soon.” Some of the briefs again reminded Mr. Bush that the attack timing was flexible, and that, despite any perceived delay, the planned assault was on track.

        Yet, the White House failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counterterrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counterterrorism group, one official suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place, two people who were there told me in interviews. The suggestion was batted down, they said, because there would be no time to train anyone else.

        http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/11/opinion/the-bush-white-house-was-deaf-to-9-11-warnings.html?_r=0

      • [[ 9/11 was set in motion years in advance ]]

        Yep.Clinton knew did nothing stating in 1995.

        [[ Bush did nothing against al qaeda prior to 9/11 and ignored warnings ]]

        Show me where GW was told that planes were going to be used on 911.

        http://www.aim.org/publications/aim_report/2001/18.html

        CATASTROPHIC INTELLIGENCE FAILURE

        In 1995, the CIA and the FBI learned that Osama bin Laden was planning to hijack U.S. airliners and use them as bombs to attack important targets in the U.S. This scheme was called Project Bojinka. It was discovered in the Philippines, where authorities arrested two of bin Laden’s agents, Ramzi Yousef and Abdul Hakim Murad. They were involved in planting a bomb on a Philippine airliner. Project Bojinka, which Philip-pine authorities found outlined on Abdul Murad’s laptop, called for planting bombs on eleven U.S. airliners and hijacking others and crashing them into targets like the CIA building.

        The hijacking part of the plan got less attention than the planting of bombs. It required aviators like Japan’s kamikaze pilots who were willing to commit suicide. Bin Laden had no such pilots in 1995, but he set out to train young fanatics willing to die for him to fly airliners. Abdul Murad, whose laptop had revealed the plan, admitted that he was being trained for a suicide mission. Bin Laden began training pilots in Afghanistan with the help of an Afghan pilot and a Pakistani general.

        Project Bojinka was known to the CIA and the FBI. It was described in court documents in the trial in New York of Ramzi Yousef and Abdul Murad for their participation in the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993. Since the CIA had been mentioned as one of the targets in Project Bojinka, it should have had an especially strong interest in any evidence that bin Laden was preparing to carry it out. The most obvious indicator, and one that should have been watched most carefully, was the recruitment of young, dedicated followers to learn to fly American airliners. That would require keeping a close watch on flight schools where that training is given.

        Oh and post a link when you take someone else work thief.

      • Actually, it would have still happened.
        but he did strike against Al Qaeda and he did try to get Osama… what did Bush do in the nine months he was President before 9/11?
        Nothing.
        all of the plans Clinton left against Osama were ignored.
        All of the warnings about al Qaeda were ignored.
        Bush did nothing.

        Beginning on Aug. 7, 1998, the day that al Qaeda destroyed the U.S. embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Clinton directed a campaign of increasing scope and lethality against bin Laden’s network that carried through his final days in office.

        • In addition to a secret “finding” to authorize covert action, which has been reported before, Clinton signed three highly
        classified Memoranda of Notification expanding theavailable tools. In succession, the president authorized killing instead of capturing bin Laden, then added several of al Qaeda’s senior lieutenants, and finally approved the shooting down of private civilian aircraft on which they flew.

        • The Clinton administration ordered the Navy to maintain two Los Angeles-class attack submarines on permanent station in the nearest available waters, enabling the U.S. military to place Tomahawk cruise missiles on any target in Afghanistan within about six hours of receiving the order.

        • Three times after Aug. 20, 1998, when Clinton ordered the only missile strike of his presidency against bin Laden’s
        organization, the CIA came close enough to pinpointing bin Laden that Clinton authorized final preparations to launch. In each case, doubts about the intelligence aborted the mission.

        • The CIA’s directorate of operations recruited, trained, paid or equipped surrogate forces in Pakistan, Uzbekistan and among tribal militias inside Afghanistan, with the common purpose of capturing or killing bin Laden. The Pakistani channel, disclosed previously in The Washington Post, and its Uzbek counterpart, which has not been reported before, never bore fruit. Inside Afghanistan, tribal allies twice reported to their CIA handlers that they fought skirmishes with bin Laden’s forces, but they inflicted no verified damage.

        • Operatives of the CIA’s Special Activities Division made at least one clandestine entry into Afghanistan in 1999. They
        prepared a desert airstrip to extract bin Laden, if captured, or to evacuate U.S. tribal allies, if cornered. The Special Collection Service, a joint project of the CIA and the National Security Agency, also slipped into Afghanistan to
        place listening devices within range of al Qaeda’s tactical radios.

      • One thing you are forgetting to mention is these terrorists were in the USA taking flight lessons and preparing for 9/11 under Clinton’s watch. Clinton could have traveled everywhere in the world, the fact remains he didn’t pay attention to what was happening right under his nose here in the U.S.

        Bush does not get a free pass, but with no intelligence warning within the Clinton administration about these terrorist thugs here in the USA it made it that much harder for an incoming president.

        The fact is…Clinton could have taken him out and made the wrong call that cost the USA dearly.

      • On this.. I agree.
        I am not giving Clinton a pass and saying he bares no responsibility for the failures that led up to 9/11

      • It was mostly about the Oil…

        Many rank and file Republicans assume that only liberals claim the Iraq war was for oil.
        In reality, the top Republican leaders say the same thing.

        Chuck Hagel said of the Iraq war in 2007:
        “People say we’re not fighting for oil. Of course we are. They talk about America’s national interest. What the hell do you think they’re talking about? We’re not there for figs.”

        4 Star General John Abizaid – the former commander of CENTCOM with responsibility for Iraq – said:
        “Of course it’s about oil, it’s very much about oil, and we can’t really deny that.”

        Former Fed Chairman Alan Greenspan – a long-time Republican – said in 2007:
        “I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the Iraq war is largely about oil”

        and tons more
        http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/03/top-republican-leaders-say-iraq-war-was-really-for-oil.html

      • yep,,, too bad

        (Reuters) – The U.S. war in Iraq has cost $1.7 trillion with an additional $490 billion in benefits owed to war veterans, expenses that could grow to more than $6 trillion over the next four decades counting interest, a study released on Thursday said.
        The war has killed at least 134,000 Iraqi civilians and may have contributed to the deaths of as many as four times that number, according to the Costs of War Project by the Watson Institute for International Studies at Brown University.
        When security forces, insurgents, journalists and humanitarian workers were included, the war’s death toll rose to an estimated 176,000 to 189,000, the study said.

        FEW GAINS

        The report concluded the United States gained little from the war while Iraq was traumatized by it. The war reinvigorated radical Islamist militants in the region, set back women’s rights, and weakened an already precarious healthcare system, the report said. Meanwhile, the $212 billion reconstruction effort was largely a failure with most of that money spent on security or lost to waste and fraud, it said.

        Former President George W. Bush’s administration cited its belief that Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s government held weapons of mass destruction to justify the decision to go to war. U.S. and allied forces later found that such stockpiles did not exist.

      • and your kinda dull and ignorant,,, maybe 30-35?
        thought you would have grown up more by now…

      • Every time oil is given as a cause for war, your age is revealed. You’re a college kid, about 20? Maybe 21?

      • Oh, the same intelligence that Clinton was using. Do you realize how many times Clinton warned of Saddam Hussein’s WMD’s and how they could be used against us?? Were you there? No, you are just going with the liberal talking points…

      • Ah.. the old two wrongs make a right defense.

        i don’t remember Clinton ordering an invasion

        Also, it wasn’t all the same intel.
        Clinton never pointed to photos of nonexistant mobile weapons labs

      • So, you are trying to say Saddam wasn’t using WMD’s? He killed his own people with them! The problem with people like you, you wait for a tragedy to occur in order to act. Everyone knew Saddam Hussein had no love for the USA…and it was a matter of time before those weapons were going to be used against us. After 9/11 the POTUS had an obligation to protect us from any more potential threats against us…..and he did.

      • I never said Saddam did not ever use WMD.
        Saddam used chemical weapons on his own people in 1983.

        We destroyed his chemical weapons production in the 1991 Gulf War.
        From 1991 onwards , there was no WMD production in Iraq.

        We did not go to war in 2003 over old degraded pre-1991 stockpile.
        We went to war over false intelligence that there was an ongoing active WMD program when it turned out there was not.

      • American troops secretly reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs, and it’s believed at least 17 American military service members were exposed to Iraq’s WMDs after 2003

        No false intelligence, it was the Democrats who politicized the war…and you fall for all the garbage they spew.

      • Wrong… the intel was false.
        And look up the details on those WMDs that were found.
        They were all pre-1991 degraded stockpiles.

        NO evidence of WMDs developed after 1991 were ever found.

      • “Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.”
        -Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

        “If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction program.”
        –President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

        “He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983.”
        –Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

        “Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies.”
        — Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

        “There is no doubt that … Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.”
        Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
        — Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

        “We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country.”
        — Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

      • …and they were wrong.
        What’s your point?

        Do you think quoting politicians who turned out to be wrong somehow makes the weapons that were discovered post-1991, instead of pre-1991.

        The intel was proven false.

      • It wasn’t proven false. There also have been many articles written on these weapons being shipped to Syria.

      • No… no weapons were shipped to Syria and there is no evidence of it.
        The only “articles” written that suggested it were opinion pieces by Bush apologists who refused to admit there were no WMDs and suggested that maybe they were shipped to Syria.
        There as been zero proof of that ever happening.

        And yes… the intel was absolutely proven false about Iraq having a post 1991 WMD program>
        We took over Iraq and we went to all the sites where our false intel said Saddam was hiding a new WMD program and found no evidence.

      • What do you know Brenden?? You just proved you are a partisan hack who only believes what the left puts out there. Sad

      • No… in fact, I proved you are a partisan hack.
        i rely on facts.

        Show me where proof was ever found that Iraq shipped WMDs to Syria.
        i bet all you’ll find is a lot of partisan right wing wishful thinking opeds with zero proof

      • What facts? You say Bush got us into a war on false intelligence, yet when shown that Democrats have been warning of the same you just blow it off as if EVERYONE was wrong except for those who want to blame Bush for everything.

        Saddam Hussein wasn’t ignoring the UN for nothing…he was hiding what was going on and anyone with a thinking brain can understand this.

        So, everything that would conclude to WMD’s possibly being shipped out of Iraq could only come from right wing sites because leftist would never dare….prove how wrong they were.

        So, do you think NBC, ABC, New York Times etc. doesn’t have a leftist agenda???

      • Reread what you just wrote.
        Yes.. .I said Bush led us to war on false intel.
        You don’t defend that … you just try to make excuses for him by saying that dems also believed the same false intel.
        SO/
        The Dems were wrong too.
        The Dems being wrong about the intel didn’t magically make Bush right.

        There is NOTHING to conclude that Saddam snuck WMDs out of the country because we found no evidence that he had made an y new WMDs… no factories… no mobile weapons labs

        Your conclusion is wishful thinking… if you refuse to accept that Bush was wrong… you will try to make up a way that the WMDs weren’t found that doesn’t involve Bush having been wrong.

      • So you just believe Saddam did nothing in the time between the warning of us invading and when we actually did go in?? LOL

        Many people disagree with you including Pentagon officials.

        People on the ground definitively tracked the Russian movement of Iraqi [chemical weapons] and high explosives to three locations in Syria and two in Lebanon in 2003

        Russian convoys of trucks that carried the arms were photographed by satellites and confirmed by the chief of Ukraine’s intelligence service, who provided the Pentagon with specifics on the special operations units involved and the material they removed, he said.

        If you don’t believe Saddam Hussein was doing everything in his power to rid of any incriminating evidence that is your problem.

      • Sorry… I prefer evidence over wild speculation based on political bias.
        And your suggestion that Russians were moving Iraqi weapons to Syria is absurd

      • HAHAHA
        you are the one who made a wild claim about Russians moving WMDS from Iraq to Syria.
        The burden of proof is on you.

        If I claim martians landed in Texas… the burden would be on me to prove my claim… not on you to disprove it.
        So go ahead.. show me proof that Russians moved weapons from Iraq to Syria.

      • In 2000, satellite photos show convoys headed for Syria from Baghdad. Records found in one warehouse listed the WMDs (mainly chemical) that were moved. Three or four months ago pictures of the ISIS who overrun Mozul in the warehouse standing in front of the piles of warheads. There were boxes dated after 1999. Some are currently being used by ISIS on Iraqi and other fighters. WMDs were there, were being used, and were moved.

      • I am aware of the old stockpiles.
        I am also aware of the rumors about WMDs being moved.
        if there is actual proof, I would love to see it.
        Do you have a link to any of this information?

      • I didn’t serve,,,
        so that make me not have love for my country?
        the fact that I don’t agree with most of what Samurai West says
        also makes me some kind of traitor??
        That I’m not a Republican or Conservative tells you what???
        grow up sparky…

      • This theory isn’t new. Senior Bush administration officials publicly flirted with the idea that Iraq transferred weapons to other nations. The claim has been promoted on conservative media and Fox News many times over the years. In 2007, Mitt Romney said that it was “entirely possible” that weapons of mass destruction were moved from Iraq to Syria during the run-up to the Iraq war. The thing is that there is absolutely zero credible evidence that this was ever the case. I called up the State Department to ask about the theory the congressman rehashed. The first spokesperson I talked to simply laughed. The second could only say that the State Department doesn’t “have any information on that.”

      • 03/16/2003, Dick Cheney, Vice President
        “My belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators. . . . I think it will go relatively quickly, . . . in weeks rather than months.”

      • 11/15/2002, Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense
        “Five days or five months, but it certainly isn’t going to last longer.”

      • 02/13/2002, Kenneth Adelman, a member of the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board
        “Liberating Iraq would be a cakewalk.”

      • Absolute bullshit! Made terrorism worse? The clown, that calls himself president, single handedly succeeded in exacerbating what has been going on for centuries, in a little less than six years! His disdain for Christians is written all over this loser, yet the chocolate messiah gets a pass from the libs! Why is that? Are there that many asshats that hate Jews, or is it just because the “KING” has spoken? Will be so grateful when this jerk leaves the Whitehouse and we can “fumigate”, our once hallowed halls of the liberal stench.

      • really?
        What did I write that was bullshit?
        Are you saying we didn’t go to war on false intel or that thousands of Americans didn’t die?

        Or are you saying that our invasion and disastrous occupation didn’t make terrorism worse?

      • “our once hallowed halls”
        too funny…
        I love seeing that ‘merican exceptionalism on full display
        They hate Obama more than they claim to love their country…..

      • Yes. Leave it to real patriot’s like me. Unlike you and Brendan, we will uphold and defend the U.S. Constitution from ALL enemies, foreign AND DOMESTIC, like Liberals, progressives, communists, socialists, and all other totalitarianists. You cowards and traitors make us sick.

      • you need to get out of the
        right-wing-conservative-nutjob-bubble.
        and if you’re feeling sick… I’m sure that Obamacare could cover that for ya…

      • Sorry kid.. you’re not a patriot.
        You’re a phony.
        i said something negative about Dick Cheney so you think I should be thrown out of the country.
        You’re a clown and you have no understanding of American values.

        It’s pathetic that idiots like you who call yourselves patriots always spout unAmerican anti-patriotic nonsense.

      • Are you still running your mouth, punk? Be VERY glad that you aren’t talking to my face. I’d love to teach you the error of your ways…American style.

      • HAHAHA… are you flirting with me?
        Sorry kid… I’m not interested.
        Take your phony patriot act somewhere else troll.

      • I can’t tell if this guy’s for real. The bald eagle with the flag in the background, the “get out of MY country” type of patriotism, and the internet tough guy act. It’s like self parody, you can’t even make fun of this.

      • What, are you inviting me over to play? I have no intention of going to Wisconsin for any reason, much less to knock sense into a Liberal.

      • Sure.. .and that’s why you can’t even point out what I wrote that was bullshit.
        You know I’m right and you are just calling it BS because you don’t like the way i said it.

      • poor little troll… you don’t like hearing the truth and since you can’t actually dispute it, you just throw tantrums

      • And you would be wrong.
        Obama has a lot of screw-ups to be held accountable for.
        Not this one.
        This one is all on Bush

      • i never said the war was false you moron.
        i said the reasons for going to war were false… and they were.

      • See what I mean Brendan……your in the minority! Get lost. Your a petulant child just like your president BO.

  9. So Bibi comes to the US, complains about Obama in a speech to Congress, and now you people think Obama should congratulate him on his win that he got by fear mongering and appealing to the racist side of Israelis??? SMDH

    • I listened to his speech to congress. He was complimentory and respectful to America’s President. Diplomatically acknowledging the good Obama has done for Israel. He never complained, but plainly disclosed the facts about the dangers nuclear ability imposses on the world in the hands of Iran. Diplomatically speaking congratulations are in order!

    • The problem with people that have a single point of focus is they think that everything is pointed towards them. I, also, watched the PM’s speech and no where did I hear him say anything against Pres Obama. I heard him telling ‘all’ that if they believed such and such they were very much mistaken. Pres Obama isn’t the only non-believer….there are many in this country making like an ostrich about Iran. By your interpretation, of which you’re not alone, “if the shoe fits……..” Or perhaps, “a guilty party needs no accuser”???? And then, of course, there is ‘no one can make you feel guilty but yourself”. Lots of idioms like that.

    • Isn’t fear mongering and hate filled commercials filled with RACISM exactly how Barry won last election…along with illegals and dead voters { FRAUD }….At least the Israel’s know where their leader was born. The only people Barry has helped are the Muslims in the hood { the muslim brotherhood } and the ILLEGAL LATINO’S…If you’d remove your head from Barry’s azz long enough you’d see what a TRAITOR HE IS…

    • Bibi complimented obama – he did not “complain” about him (which he certainly could have)
      you need to reread the speech obviously you missed something

  10. Well if Bibi ever openly Tweeted that he is for the annihilation of all Muslims then I will believe your NONSENSE that he is a racist. #reasonoverhate-get a clue the muslin Holocaust deniers like Erdogan of Turkey deserve your disdain

  11. Obama has lowered America to his own trash level by not congratulating Netanyahu ….and he and the democrats will pay for this sligh!

  12. I think that deep inside Obama envies Bibi. Bilingual Bibi, nearly perfect English, a true world leader and statesman. What is Obama compared to him? The incoherent president of millions of incoherent Americans, those who voted for him twice.

  13. Netanyahu did not come only to serve Israel’s interests. He came to warn us about Iran being extremely dangerous. Do you remember the Hezbollah terrorist attacks in Argentina? According to the Tel Aviv University, Argentine Army officers on active duty provided Hezbollah with explosives to blow, respectively, the Israeli embassy and the DAIA Jewish social center. All of it with the OK from Teheran. And who are the Argentine military, but heirs of Hitler? Can anyone but me see a secret alliance there?

  14. A nuclearized Iran is a danger to humankind. In “Nuclear terrorism-The Ultimate Preventable
    Catastrophe,” published in 2004, Graham Allison points out that nuclear
    terrorism is a concrete possibility.
    Allison recalls an ABC News test through which radioactive material,
    depleted uranium, was smuggled into the United States in a suitcase shipped in
    a cargo container from Jakarta, Indonesia; the author also points out that
    declassified information now allows anyone whose academic background is Physics
    or even Engineering to build nuclear weapons powerful enough to blow up entire
    cities.

  15. Obama is not friends of all Muslims let me tell you he is a friend of the Shiite and militant movements he has back stabbed Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and all the Gulf States. Those states are all relieved Bibi won. Obama has a special interest group its called radical Islam he wants to destroy the state with the most calm and bring destruction because he is in with the Muslim BROTHERHOOD he is in with the Shiite clerks he is in with hamas, hezbolla etc when he talks about his love fro islam it isnt SIsi or King Abdullah of Jordan he is talking to he is talking to the murders of the world trade center. He Obama wants Israel and the Jewish people destroyed. However the Jews who practice Liberalism as there religion and not Judaism or to blind to see that

  16. reckon which world leader Obama will want to campaign against now. ALL the man knows how to do is campaign and do fundraisers.

  17. bath house barry is not able to call PM Netanyahu because he is stoned out of his skull, Iranian Valerian Jarrat had to tranquilize him and heavily sedate him to prevent permanent damage from the nervous breakdown, apoplexy fit and heart attack he had upon hearing of his failure to overthrow Israel’s legally elected PM. His bong has been going non stop only stopping to reload ever since hearing the news. He also had to keep reggie love on call with a viagra IV to keep reggie’s ” pacifier” inside poor barry

  18. Analysis: Disappointment at the White House after Netanyahu victory
    3/18/2015

    Obama administration officials have publicly questioned the leadership of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for months, but on Wednesday, they largely remained stoic faced with questions on the prospect of two more years forced to work with the man. ….
    http://www.jpost.com/Israel-Elections/Disappointment-at-the-White-House-394382

    +++++++

    On the other hand ….

    FOOD FOR THOUGHT

    Jennifer Psaki: “Yes, we are comfortable doing business with the Muslim Brotherhood.”
    February 2, 2015
    http://freebeacon.com/national-security/state-dept-misled-reporters-about-meeting-with-muslim-brotherhood/

    Muslim Brotherhood vows not to recognize Israel
    01/01/2012
    http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=251732

    White House Congratulates Egypt’s Morsi
    6/24/12
    http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/06/white-house-congratulates-egypts-morsi-127117.html

    Muslim Brotherhood Takes Egypt, Cleric Declares: Our Capital ‘Shall Be Jerusalem, Allah Willing’
    June 24, 2012
    http://nation.foxnews.com/egypts-new-president-morsi/2012/06/24/muslim-brotherhood-takes-egypt-cleric-declares-our-capital-shall-be-jerusalem-allah-willing

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here