The single most frightening consequence of a nuclear Iran no one is discussing

I find it rather perplexing that President Barack Hussein Obama finds it more difficult to negotiate and work with Republicans than concede to Iranians. Furthermore, those who actually believe a nuclear Iran can be contained citing the Soviet Union as an example are in my opinion, delusional.

The Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) theory that existed with the Soviets is untenable with the Islamic Republic of Iran, which is a theocracy and fully embraces the belief that such a weapon is necessary in the quest to restore Islamic dominance and the return of the 12th — hidden Imam — the Mahdi. Any denial of those truths held by the Iranian Ayatollahs — who are the power brokers — reflects complete naiveté and a dismissal of their religious-based foreign policy.

Even more dangerous is the revelation that President Obama believes a nuclear deal with Iran is an integral part of his legacy — one that would certainly seal the fate of Israel and begin a modern nuclear arms race in the Middle East. And so with all this as the backdrop, America has deployed Secretary of State John Kerry to negotiate — from a position of assured weakness — with Iran.

I mean, really?

As reported by Yahoo! News, “Prospects of a nuclear deal with Iran by a deadline slipped further away Sunday despite frenzied last-minute diplomacy, forcing the U.S. and partner nations to start working on ways to extend the talks, diplomats said. Two Western diplomats said talks were continuing with Iran on trying to bridge differences on reducing Tehran’s ability to make nuclear weapons to levels acceptable to Washington while giving the Islamic republic the relief it seeks from international sanctions over its atomic activities.”

Amazingly enough, we’re sitting down with the country known as the largest state sponsor of Islamic terrorism, asking them to curtail a program which they refuse to admit exists. This is true folly. Iran is operating under the understanding that the West — especially the United States — does not wish to have a confrontation with them, ceding them the moral high ground. Also, Iran knows the United States – i.e. Obama – doesn’t want to reengage in Iraq and prefers to NOT deal with the ISIS issue — another major leverage point.

This is why the short-term campaign promise of a complete withdrawal from Iraq will go down as one of the greatest foreign policy and national security blunders in history. In the long term, we have elevated Iran as a dominant power in the region. Consider who is actually controlling Iraq. Who is propping up Bashar al-Assad in Syria? Who is backing Hezbollah in Lebanon? Who is supporting Hamas with next generation longer-range rockets? Who is exporting Islamic terrorism into our hemisphere by way of the Revolutionary Guard forces and Al Quds — who are exploiting our porous border? Who is backing the Al Houthi’s who have ascended to power in Yemen? Who has made overt threats to “wipe off the map” the one nation supposed to be our best ally in the Middle East? And who is now dictating the terms of nuclear agreement with the West and America? Yes, the answer is Iran.

Iran smells our fear and our weak reticence to confront them — a repeat of history between Hitler and Neville Chamberlain — and we know how that ended up.

Another delay only serves as a victory for Iran and allows them to continue their centrifuges and march towards a nuclear capability and capacity. But what I assess to be the greatest threat of Iran having a device and the delivery platform — working in conjunction with North Korea, which we know they possess – is an EMP attack. EMP stands for Electronic Magnetic Pulse and would simply entail a nuclear detonation in the atmosphere enabling a shut down of our entire grid system — which needs hardening.

It could be easily done from a cargo ship just outside our sovereign waters — or even infiltrated inside. And I am quite sure the progressive socialists who are supportive of our surrender to Iran would rather attack my assessment than listen to what I’m presenting.

After all, we do have Russian bombers now flying all over the place – including over Guam, along our west coast, and the Gulf of Mexico. I suppose it’s easier to attack the domestic political opposition instead of the true enemies of liberty and freedom.

Yahoo! News says, “U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry was meeting Sunday evening with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. One of the diplomats said Kerry and Zarif could start floating the need to focus on going past the Monday deadline discussions at that point. The two diplomats demanded anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the confidential negotiations. A U.S. official acknowledged that the prospect of add-on talks past Monday was now being considered. “It is only natural that less than 48 hours from the deadline we are discussing a range of options,” the official said on condition of anonymity for the same reason. “An extension is one of those options. It should come as no surprise that we will also engage in a discussion of the options with the Iranians at some point as well.”

There is only one quality respected and understood in the Middle East and that is strength — and the resolve and might to face down your enemies. At this moment, none of that exists and the ramifications for our foreign policy are detrimental to say the least. There is a coming storm and the next U.S. president will have a bevy of adversaries and belligerents — non-state and state — against which to contend, and confront. However, most dangerous would be a nuclear Iran — and hearing some talk of “containment” of Iran means there is an air of appeasement and acquiescence that does not bode well for the future.

Leave a Reply

20 Comments on "The single most frightening consequence of a nuclear Iran no one is discussing"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
thundrn
Guest

I am sorry Mr West you are wrong. largest state sponsor of Islamic terrorism is the US government! Not that I needed to be told however, apparently, you do sir! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A73kgX8fPpI&feature=youtu.be

Sgtsnuffy
Guest
Really? Do you know what a Collaborator and Sympathizer are !!! The USA is the Biggest Sponsor of Terrorism in the World???? And who told you that your Communist/Socialist Professor ???? Your NAMBLA Friend from San Fransisco ???? Your Democrat Progressive room mate ?????? Your Local Mosque IMAM or Mullah ????? It’s people like you that have brought our nation to where it’s at, at this time in History. Your kind have repeatedly brow beat this country into believing it is the most Evil Nation ever created upon the face of the Earth, Worse than Hitlers Germany, Stalin’s Russia, and… Read more »
thundrn
Guest

Day’s of denial are over. Real people die every day for their false flag wars and events of terror sold to a blind public. All it takes is knowledge and with the net, you can go to the college of real life. It is unbiased and wholesomely refreshing and it’s degree, priceless!

Ace
Guest

“False flag.” The giveaway. Next it’s the Freemasons and Bilderbergers.

thundrn
Guest

The picture Skippy, that’s all anyone needs to know your an idiot!

Ace
Guest

What is “the picture Skippy”? Is Skippy a person or a picture? Or, are you introducing peanut butter into this debate? If so, why?

Spelling lessons for the day:

1. its

2. you’re.

thundrn
Guest
Dr. Jim Fetzer, author, professor, founder of Scholars for 9-11 Truth, Marine retired. We work for his efforts and many others including our own seminars. Sir, I am sorry to give you the data that is real, you can view it 4 of the days out of 21 currently, and by march 2015 all the way to March 2016 if you survive the global catastrophes soon to fall here above what we currently experience. Man you have some powerful learning in a damn short amount of time if you wish to be on the right side when probation closes. God… Read more »
Ace
Guest

Now THAT is some goofy stuff.

thundrn
Guest
My research told me that. The arms transfers in Benghazi from the CIA operation there. the fact that or communist President is dropping arms and supplies to ISIS with C-130 drops. Don’t believe me, how about one of our highly decorated purged Generals; I love this country sir or the dream that is America. I hate the criminals who are career politicians. I hate the foreign owned federal reserve that carry’s home mortgages printing worthless paper then validates that loan by attributing it to our monthly line of credit and then the people of this country carry that loan while… Read more »
Adetoz
Guest

lol, liberals…ISIS rapes women on a daily basis and beheads men regularly, Iran supports Hamas and Hezbollah…but America is the real enemy?
One day the liberal will be at the bottom of a hastily dug trench, staring at the end of a gun, held by a jihadi and he will say “Oh how I have been foolish, oh how wrong I was”.

thundrn
Guest
No, and you are an idiot. A person or in this case an entity, can control a rattlesnake in a box, put it in someone’s bead, (a country) and it will complete the desired effect. However, when that entity goes back to re-box the snake, great caution must be exercised as it can and will certainly try and bite you. everything for the most part you claim is true. You only are looking at some of the evidence and refuse even entertain the truth. Well sir, it is exactly why we are here today, stand tall, be proud, the arrogant… Read more »
Chuck Bump
Guest

Are you suggesting that a liberal would admit he was wrong? You have more faith in them than I do.

thundrn
Guest

Not only that, you are a shill!

thundrn
Guest

Yes you are wrong, you are a fool. Our government is the “kings” of getting people to do their bidding. You are nothing but pawns in a world of control. Our military fights and dies for their games. Our citizens, your citizens die get raped, all for their profit and enjoyment.

Ace
Guest

Bilderbergers!!!!

Republic
Guest

View AmericaIdea for the 2016 Dream Candidate.

Vote for the repub best in 2016? Indeed, why waste your vote and keep going along with mediocrity?

Where do we go, what do we do, where do we turn repubs wonder … better hurry up, get with the Dream, before ’16 arrives and you go under …

Paul Sheridan
Guest
“It could be easily done from a cargo ship just outside our sovereign waters — or even infiltrated inside.” No. No it could not. This is absolutely false and anybody who knows anything about EMP knows that its false. In order for a nuclear weapon to generate a large EMP effect two things have to be true. 1) It must have line of sight to the affected target 2) It must be free from atmospheric absorption An EMP attack requires a nuclear device to be detonated above the atmosphere. That means a missile and and not the small, cheap, easily… Read more »
Ace
Guest

If a detonation is above the atmosphere doesn’t that mean that the absolute maximum of atmospheric absorption will interfere with the pulse?

Paul Sheridan
Guest

Interference maybe isn’t the right word. The gamma ray burst generates a electromagnetic pulse when it strikes the atmosphere so the footprint is much larger if the weapon can be detonated above the atmosphere. Read more here if you’re interested http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_electromagnetic_pulse

Ace
Guest

Thanks. It’s technical stuff. One section, “Weapon Altitude,” says that the detonation generates gamma rays/photons that generate electrons that “are then trapped in the Earth’s magnetic field, giving rise to an oscillating electric current. This current is asymmetric in general and gives rise to a rapidly rising radiated electromagnetic field called an electromagnetic pulse (EMP).” I see that the atmosphere appears not to “soak up” the energy of the pulse. Altitude is good for ensuring even continent-wide effects.