Dumbest government overreach ever: $1000 fine for wilderness photos?

One of the first amendment rights we enjoy here in America is a free press – it was designed to ensure Americans were informed with the truth. While responsible, objective journalism may just be a thing of the past, we should never infringe upon the freedom of the press — and somebody needs to remind the Obama administration about that. We all know this administration has issues with transparency, and his White House has been confronted by the press — and attacked them back.

However, a recent development really makes you wonder what’s going on. As Cosmopolitan reports (no, I don’t regularly read Cosmo, in case you were wondering), “This week’s most profoundly wrongheaded display of nonviolent press infringement comes from an unlikely source: The U.S. Forest Service. New rules being finalized in November state that across this country’s gloriously beautiful, endlessly photogenic, 193 million acres of designated wilderness area administered by the USFS, members of the press who happen upon it will need permits to photograph or shoot video. And yes, it does sound like one of the dumbest things you’ve ever read.”

I concur, this is certainly one of the dumbest things I’ve EVER heard but it’s just another example of progressive socialism and the burgeoning statist mentality –it’s just another form and example of taxation. Now, you just have to ask, how does a USFS Ranger delineate between an American tourist taking nice shots and a member of the press? Perhaps this new rule is truly intended to obstruct the ability of any American — actually anyone — from taking photos or video?

“It’s pretty clearly unconstitutional,” said Gregg Leslie, legal defense director at the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press in Alexandria, Va. “They would have to show an important need to justify these limits, and they just can’t.”

Then again Mr. Leslie, when has government ever felt the need to justify its actions? And therein lies the slow encroachment of tyranny — the ability of the bureaucratic state to institute any rule it wants. And consider this, how do the American people find out about this rule? Why is this not being brought before the elected representatives for consideration? And what of the voices of the Western states delegations first of all — oops, as we’ve reported, the federal government already consumes much of their land anyhow.

Cosmopolitan reports “Liz Close, the Forest Service’s acting wilderness director, didn’t cite any real-life examples of why the policy is needed or what problems it’s addressing. She didn’t know whether any media outlets had applied for permits in the last four years.”

And that, folks, is government at its best — they don’t know why and can’t present examples — but they just know what’s best.

“The Organic Act of 1897 is the legislation responsible for establishing the modern U.S. Forest Service, clearly provides: The jurisdiction, both civil and criminal, over persons within such reservations shall not be affected or changed by reason of the existence of such reservations, except so far as the punishment of offenses against the United States therein is concerned; the intent and meaning of this provision being that the State wherein any such reservation is situated shall not, by reason of the establishment thereof, lose its jurisdiction, nor the inhabitants thereof their rights and privileges as citizens, or be absolved from their duties as citizens of the State.”

As the article points out, “All U.S. citizens enjoy the right of the First Amendment, and courts have very clearly upheld the rights of a citizen to take photographs taken in a public place — even the unpopular ones, and even ugly, boring ones of trees and mountains. And as for “duties as citizens of the State.” Well, it’s called the Fourth Estate for a reason. That’s what the U.S. Forest Service is hurting here: the understanding that the public has a right to this land, and right to know about it, with media more expressive than words.”

Well, Ms. Close of the Forest Service, doesn’t seem to agree. She said the agency was implementing the Wilderness Act of 1964, which aims to protect wilderness areas from being exploited for commercial gain. “That’s kind of a distortion,” says Peter Essick, an award-winning National Geographic photographer who has worked with the Forest Service before, as well as the other agencies that oversee American wildernesses for years to produce truly remarkable work. “When the Wilderness Act was created in 1964, there were plenty of people doing photography,” he says. “Nothing in the Wilderness Act says photography is not approved or banned.”

I truly believe this is one of those “unifying” issues. I was just out in Silverthorne, Colorado this past weekend and was overwhelmed by the grandeur and beauty — and now we’re going to restrict and infringe upon the Constitutional right to enjoy and capture the splendor on film? I also enjoy my time SCUBA diving, so will this restriction also extend to places like the John Pennekamp reef near Key Largo? We can all agree this is government gone wild and here is what we can all do.

Cosmopolitan says, “to their credit, the Forest Service has opened themselves up to comment. Call them out, and post some photos on Instagram and Twitter while you’re at it. If you don’t, then silence is consent, and you’ll reap what you have sown and get the government you deserve — a tyrannical one.

Leave a Reply

17 Comments on "Dumbest government overreach ever: $1000 fine for wilderness photos?"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Charles Benci
Guest

This is one of the reasons i always said, It has only taken OBAMA 6 years to turn this country into Communism

msueh
Guest

He is surely working on it – we need to stand fast against him.

Earl Lee
Guest

And you seriously have to be a SPECIAL KIND OF STUPID to believe that AMERICA is a COMMUNIST nation!!

msueh
Guest

Is it really necessary to be so rude? I know it’s easier when you don’t have to face the person you’re taking to, but – really?

Earl Lee
Guest

YEP!! I follow Allen (rob these loons blind)west’s example!!!

BrittneyGJones
Guest

I just got paid <-$7500 by working part time off of a lap-top b­­­­­­­­y G­­­­­­­­­­­­oog­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­l­­­­­e­­­­­­­­­­­­­.I­ a­­m m­­a­­k­­­­i­n­­­g a go­­od sa­­la­­ry ­­­­­­­­­fr­­­om ­­­­­­­­­h­­.o­­m­e ­­­­­­­­­$­­5­5­0­0­­­­­­­­­-­­­­­­­­­$­­7000/w­­­­­e­e­k..L­­­ast Thursday I got a brand new BM­­­W since getting a check for $647­­­4 this – 4 weeks past. I beg­­­an this 8-months ago and imm­­­ediately was bringing home at lea­­­st $97 pesdr hour. I wo­­­rk thr­­­ough this link, go to tech tab for work det­­­ail­­­

—————————————————————–

Here ­­­­­­­­­is ­­­­­­­­­I ­­­­­­­­­started—– http://Net.MoneyCashs97$……
>>>>>
——————————————————————

–>(go on NEWS tab of this page))

msueh
Guest

ok, taking a page from your book- You: special kind of fool..

Ray - Jesus is the Son of God
Guest
Ray - Jesus is the Son of God

Because there has been a lot of talk lately about Obama being the Antichrist,
we have decided to address this issue on our Bible Prophecy website..
The answer may surprise you.. Visit: itshallcometopass.org

msueh
Guest

I just took a couple breaths without getting a special permit – am I going to be fined?????

Joe M
Guest

A picture is worth a thousand….dollars.

MotherBatherick
Guest

To the obama regime, it is. But just wait until the EPA starts regulating the heck out of their land and water usage for their pot farms. The NOAA is already making a ruckus. Too funny…

Micky
Guest

So….

the way things are going, if I leave the park with an image, etched forever in my mind, of two squirrels having a threesome with an acorn I’ll have to pay a thousand bucks for the memory, plus an animal porn tax.
And then get blasted by some environmentalist for violating the acorns privacy.

RedStateJoe
Guest
This isn’t tyranny, it’s the democratic process of rule and regulation making. This reg is likely a bad idea, which is why it should be heavily commented on during what is known as the comment period. When living under tyranny, the people don’t get to (1) elect the congress that passes the enabling legislation, (2) have congress overule any regs made by the agencies, or (3) make comment before a reg is fully enabled and expect those comments to be fully considered. When has the Gov’t even listened to the people? Every two years when we have a federal election… Read more »
Lowell
Guest

The Federal Government has no constitutional right to that 193 million acres of wilderness land. And I don’t know if you have noticed, but the current administration has been defying court orders on a regular basis.

RedStateJoe
Guest

Name the court order Obama’s administration has been violating, please.

The idea that the Federal government has no right to own land is nonsense. Seriously, were did you get that bit of crazy?

Lowell
Guest

Don’t play stupid: Lois Lerner, and Eric Holder.
As to land holding: http://www.heritage.org/constitution/#!/articles/1/essays/58/military-installations

RedStateJoe
Guest

Court orders … list them. Holder and Lerner do not in any way involve court orders. Do you even know what a court order is?

Your Heritage article confirms the federal gov’t has the right to control land … in other words, you lose.