Inane liberal threat: give illegals amnesty or they’ll become terrorists

You want to know just how desperate progressive socialists are to have their way with illegal immigration and surrendering our border? Just take a listen to what a Democrat in Iowa had to say.

As reported by the Daily Caller, “Democratic State Representative and candidate for U.S. representative Pat Murphy said Tuesday that if the underage migrants who have come to the U.S. from Central America aren’t given a “pathway for citizenship” they could become terrorists. Speaking with Iowa Public Radio host Ben Kieffer, Murphy said that “we need to make sure that we take care of the children that are coming up here.”

“They’re not from Mexico, they’re coming from further south,” Murphy continued. “We need to make sure that when we’re talking about these children we need to treat them like they’re our children or our grandchildren. If they’re gonna be refugees, which several of them are going to be, we need to make sure that we have—one, we take care of them, and we create a pathway for citizenship and set up education for them so they don’t become the same problem that we’re currently having in the Middle East—that they’ll be terrorists a generation from now.”

So in other words, we need to make them citizens or else, since it’s our fault, they will resort to terrorism. I hate to tell this loon but actually gangs like MS-13 are already here! And as we reported, ISIS may be too.

Talk about fear mongering and threats — how much worse could it get? So what, we are now “occupiers”? It’s inane statements like this that really makes me question the sanity of progressive socialists.

The Daily Caller says, “Murphy, who has called himself “a liberal’s liberal,” was endorsed by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, the political action committee famous for drafting Elizabeth Warren to run for Senate and instigating Scott Walker’s recall election. “He supports expanding Social Security benefits, holding Wall Street accountable, lowering student loan interest rates, and Elizabeth Warren’s economic populist agenda,” read their endorsement.”

So the question is, will the Progressive Change Campaign Committee continue their support of Murphy and stand by their endorsement? And just how many other “Democrats” stand by this assertion — y’all went apoplectic over the comments of Richard Murdoch and Todd Akin and linked every single Republican to them…turn about is certainly fair play but I bet you won’t hear a peep from the progressive media and other Democrats about this chucklehead!

Spread the word folks, the Democrat party wants amnesty for illegals so we don’t force them into becoming terrorists. And message to State Rep. Murphy: I have two children and I want the American dream for them, not for any political agenda to benefit your Marxist/socialist fundamental transformation of America.

Leave a Reply

55 Comments on "Inane liberal threat: give illegals amnesty or they’ll become terrorists"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
SouthernMan
Guest

How will that work out for ISIL illegal immigrants.

Redshirt
Guest

That Dumocrap is a fool- yes, a fool- because he thinks law abiding American citizen are fool enough to believe that Bulls–t

4MeNoRinos
Guest

all the more reason to close our borders and deport all who have come here illegally. How many of them wish us harm, many of them I am sure.

Yojimbo556
Guest

Catholic Terrorists!? Why that would be a liberal wet dream. It would justify all this liberal hate towards people they dont agree with.

Charles Rosenburg
Guest

One question. Why not let the kids from Mexico in too? They’re already on the way to being narco-terrorists.

Savage Patriot
Guest

Gosh ….According to him then somewhere around 150,000,000 American Citizens May become Terrorists when we stand up and tell these Invaders to get the hell out!

DerangedMuppet
Guest

Isn’t that what Dirty Harry Reid called everybody that stood up to him at the Bundy Ranch?

Alan Tuttle
Guest

What did the progressives say earlier: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste?”

That’s how this progressive is treating things. It is all FUD to them (fear, uncertainty, doubt.) We have the ISIS crisis on our hands. And, they’re now using it in the case of our border security. These progressives have no morals. They have no conscience.

Bob Marly
Guest

They want our bullets and guns and they refuse to secure our Border? I hate to see America in 5 yrs or even scarier 10 years.

Pat Nash
Guest

Oh,they’ll become terrorist, then we’ll surely be justified in getting rid of them huh? What a pathetic public dunce and a waste of a voters vote.

gksnana
Guest

He is a big part of the problem. When they know the possibility / probability is there, why take that chance with our country and our citizens? Send them back and problem is solved.

The Grinning Narcissist
Guest
The Grinning Narcissist

All you have to do is look at the sign he’s fronting to tell you everything you need to know about this brain-dead moron.

William Richardson
Guest

They are losing big time in the polls. They are more concerned with getting future voters than worrying about terrorism. Notice how concerned they are about terrorism now? NOT.

DerangedMuppet
Guest

Don’t count them out just yet… When there’s doubt, guarantee some dead people will rise from the grave and vote for these chuckle heads!

Wendy Ann De Rycke
Guest

No, the under age illegal immigrants were the cover used for letting the terrorists enter the country. They will more likely become gang members in their teens if they are in any major city, and living in near poverty.

Wava Currey
Guest

Heres a better way. Don’t let them in.

TruConserv
Guest

“So in other words, we need to make them citizens or else, since it’s our fault, they will resort to terrorism..”

Anytime you begin a rebuttal with “So, in other words,” you’ve already lost the debate. It’s a good indicator you’re about to lie or distort what was actually said, and that is the case here.

At least Allen has the decency to signal his deceit.

handgunnar
Guest

“Anytime you begin a rebuttal with “So, in other words,” you’ve already lost the debate.”
No, it merely clarifies the debate by translating your deceptive language into plain English, thus revealing your dishonesty.

TruConserv
Guest

Go find someone you respect as a speaker and a person of integrity and honesty, ask them what they think of people who say “in other words.”

Jack Daniels
Guest

It is interesting that your name is TruConserv. You clearly are a Liberal. Mentally ill. Keep hiding behind your keyboard you coward.

Jack Daniels
Guest

Get some help. You are a know it all that knows nothing and is too self absorbed to see it.

TruConserv
Guest
I am a true conservative. To the right of Reagan, to the left of the Tea Party, I’m a fan of true debate. I don’t resort to insults or lies. I don’t use stereotypes or labels as a shortcut to thinking. My post, in truth, is spectrum neutral. I don’t reveal anything about my politics in my post other than I think — as does most everyone skilled in rhetoric — that using “in other words” is a tell for intellectual weakness. That applies to those on the right and the left. What I find interesting is that based on… Read more »
Patriot7972
Guest

LOL! UM wow, what? IF your right of Reagan (LOL) and left of tea party (True conservatives) then you would be labeled a ‘moderate’ and if in GOP a ‘Rhino’. It scares me the logic that some ooze out certain post member’s mouths….

TruConserv
Guest

No one adept in political science would argue that Tea Party members are true conservatives, as that term is used in ordinary English. If you think that Reagan is to the left of a Moderate, making him a liberal, then, well, that’s all we need to know about you.

Patriot7972
Guest

Your inane babbling and trying your best to make you sound sophisticated and philosophical is an absolute sham and disgrace. You are nothing but a charlatan TrueConserv, but keep trying your best to worthlessly impress us all because it’s not working. Your not worth the time for any further postings Liberal troll.

TruConserv
Guest

Lovely, more Tea Party name calling. Perhaps someday you’ll respond with a combination of facts and cogent argument.

Patriot7972
Guest

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moderate Quote from article>>

As a political position

Voters who describe themselves as centrist often mean that they are
MODERATE in their political views, advocating neither extreme left-wing politics nor right-wing politics. Gallup polling has shown American voters identifying themselves as moderate between 35–38% of the time over the last 20 years.[3]
Voters may identify with moderation for a number of reasons: pragmatic,
ideological or otherwise. It has even been suggested that individuals
vote for ‘centrist’ parties for purely statistical reasons.[4]

TruConserv
Guest

I never described myself as a centrist. You fail to understand the meaning a spectrum and the meaning of waypoints. By stating, factually, that I am between two waypoints that are on the right does not mean that I am in the middle between left and right.

Americantrek09
Guest

Pat, you are a FLICKING retard on top of being a sh it eating Communist !

Danny Robertson
Guest

I wish that punk of face book he knows I’m talking about him. Stop messing with the freedom of words.

Houdini50
Guest

candidate for U.S. representative Pat Murphy , then you take then and take care of their needs you pos!

denverlady
Guest

Hey Murphy…let me give you a clue. If you give them amnesty, we the true American Citizens of this Country will not put up with ANY criminal behavior. We care about children being put in this situation, but we will kick the criminals butts back to where they came!

Billie F Smith
Guest

We will start giving the rapists and murderers the justice they deserve since Obama has obviously let all judges know they are hands off on prosecutions1 You will see what Americans won’t tolerate you keep pushing! Get these ILLEGAL INVADERS OUT OF OUR COUNTRY!

En Ren Grottman
Guest

He (Murphy) keeps stating “We”…….must have a turd in his pocket….

T.O.
Guest

Idiot

kat-dis
Guest

Send them to Iraq now What the f##k are the democrats smoking

MotherBatherick
Guest

Whether from Mexico or, as progressive socialist Pat Murphy says, “farther south”, I don’t care where they are from; they are still illegal invaders, terrorists or not.

How about we protect ourselves and our country from the likes of Elizabeth Warren and her ilk by seeing to it that they are exposed for what they really are; domestic progressive socialist terrorists.

Doesntplaywellwithothers
Guest

So this clown is admitting the people trying to illegally gain entry to the USA are violent extremists who need to be bribed with US taxpayer dollars into being peaceful citizens. OK.

joanne
Guest

Sicko

Matthew Russell
Guest

no. they know that they let in terrorists. so that when they start attacking. they are gonna blame it on us and say “see i told you so” you didnt give them amnesty and they became terrorists. when in fact they were already.

M Jones
Guest

What will it say about Iowans who vote for this “liberal’s liberal” ?

John Burks
Guest

this guy is crazier than any loon. i’m with you Col. West the progressive liberals are mentally challenged.

elfman2
Guest
He’s right, and this was foreseen at least 7 years ago when McCain proposed amnesty. If we give them ANY form of legal recognition for ANY length of time, it will be many times more difficult to deport them than before, and we won’t have the political will to do it. Therefore, we need to give those that have been processed a realistic pathway to citizenship because two classes of residents would be infinitely worse than having them as voters in a few years. The damage has been done people. No value is created by arguing over the last war.… Read more »
gjsmith_62
Guest

The path way to citizenship is going back to whence you came and APPLY for legal residency.

BTW, news for you McCain isn’t president.

elfman2
Guest

Good luck with that. If we couldn’t do it under Reagan, Bush, or Bush, what makes you think we’ll do it under Obama, Hillary or who ever defeats her after they’ve all been here 3 more years and given amnesty. America was screwed. Focus on the next battle, or hang out in an echo chamber and bitch about it. Your choice.

gjsmith_62
Guest

Continue to vote democrat, suits you well.

MizRispee
Guest
Liberal political agenda: He needs to pay a visit to the Eastern European countries where Communism and Socialism have ruled for years, and see the lasting effects its had on their economies and people. I just returned from a river cruise 3 weeks ago and it was a real eye-opener (Romania, Bulgaria, Hungary, Serbia, & Croatia). One reads about these countries, but when one actually sees firsthand, it was a bit of a shock (to me anyway). These countries are “in transition” toward Democracy and Capitalism, yet their unemployment rates are anywhere from 17% to 30%. Impoverishment most everywhere. Factories… Read more »
gjsmith_62
Guest

A liberal’s liberal? So he an ignorant democrat on steroids? If these “children” are to become terrorists, why not Keep Them The He\ OUT!?

Time to deport every illegal alien, starting with those violent criminals Obama’s released into every state in the union.

Clay Burruss
Guest

Its an easy fix don’t let them live that long

Allen
Guest

And if you invite random strangers into your house, you solve the breaking-and-entering issues we have now … Nice logic!

DezzNutz
Guest

IOWA…make sure this guy stays just a “candidate”

garys
Guest

I have learned over the years that you cannot hold a rational discussion with people who hold irrational positions. In my experience you have to include all leftists/progressives in your definition of irrational people; they have no use for facts; once they take a position they will not abandon it for love or money (well, maybe for money, especially if they are politicians).

TruConserv
Guest

The position that everyone on the left is irrational is, by itself, irrational, rendering you someone that should not be engaged in discussion.

People on the left have facts, they just aren’t the facts we consider important.

I say the same thing to them when they rant that those on the right have no facts.

Writing and thinking as you do, garys, will lead us nowhere.

Rob W. Case
Guest
These irrational words do not surprise me in the slightest. When you’re from a liberal, moon bat state (like Illinois, California, Massachusetts, New York, and so forth), and a majority of the people are so prejudiced against Republicans, yet so loyal to Democrats (despite whether or not it defies all forms of logic and reason), then the Democrats are always going to say crazy and insane things not having the slightest clue that this is, in fact, the case. They have an agenda, and are simply stating (with the comfort and security knowing that they are highly favored among the… Read more »
Gene Poole
Guest
So we must submit to blackmail by Illegals? If we don’t give benefits, free education, shelter, food, and citizenship to every illegal that crosses our borders, they will become terrorists and kill us. That is what ‘progressives’ call logic, but normal people call it insanity. We must not give in to blackmail by people who break our laws. In reality, democrats need poorly educated, low skilled long term dependent on government illegals to indoctrinate in liberal ideology, and vote democrat. Conservatives want LEGAL Immigrants that respect our laws, have skills we need, and represent ALL cultures, races and religions. Respect… Read more »