The military teaches commanders to look at not only what is obvious, but to anticipate second and third order effects based on indicators and warnings. So on the surface, the fact that Breitbart has reported that Muhammad is the most popular boy’s name in Britain will cause most Islamist apologists’ heads to explode as they cry “Islamophobia,” because what should it matter? But it does.
As exclusively reported by Breitbart London last week, “Muhammed has been crowned Britain’s most popular boys name in figures published by the Office of National Statistics (ONS) today. The name beat Oliver as the most popular boy’s name chosen by parents in Britain in 2013. As a result of the way the statistics are put together, the name does not appear to have won, as the ONS classifies each of the different spellings as a different entry on the list. This means that “Muhammad” came in 15th with 3,499 children but “Mohammed” was 23rd with 2,887 and “Mohammad” was 57th with 1059 given the name. Added together, the top three spellings alone accounted for the names of 7,445 boys, easily beating the second most popular name, Oliver, which got just 6,949. Also the statistics are only published for the top 100 names, so the even more obscure spellings of Mohammed are likely to push the total even higher.”
The real issue to consider is the demographic shift occurring not just in London, England, but across Europe overall. As a matter of fact, this was very well examined in Mark Steyn’s book, America Alone. This migration phenomenon is based on a tradition of Mohammed known as Al Hijra. It occured when the first phase of Islam ended and the second began after Mohammad was ridiculed and rejected, because the populace in Mecca did not believe in his “night ride” to Jerusalem — which had many similarities to Jesus’ entry to Jerusalem. As a result, Mohammed joined fled Mecca to Medina and there joined violent raiding gangs as the theme of the verses in the Koran took a more violent turn.
But this idea of Hijra came to mean migration in order to further the spread of Islam — which is what Britain and Europe is experiencing. There are neighborhoods in London where regular police officers don’t even venture. These neighborhoods are under sharia law governance – which should be antithetical to English law.
And this phenomenon is evident in the massive anti-Israel protests we’ve recently witnessed which have a political effect as well. As we reported here, more Britons are signing up to fight in Syria and Iraq with ISIS than are joining the British Army Reserve. And it returns to cause unimaginable violence at home, as with the savage massacre of British soldier, Lee Rigby.
Back to Breitbart’s report, as a means of comparative analysis, “Muhammad was No. 61 on the ONS list in 2002. The number of Muslims in Britain has doubled since then. The choice of Muhammad is widespread among the three million Muslims who live in Britain Many of them name at least one son a variance of the name” — the question is how many sons are they having? (And if it’s anything like the Tsarnaev brothers here in the U.S I wonder how many are living on government assistance?)
After all, it was the late Libyan President Muammar al-Gaddafi who is said to have predicted, “There are signs that Allah will grant victory to Islam in Europe without swords, without guns, without conquest. We don’t need terrorists, we don’t need homicide bombs. The 50-plus million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”
If the popularity of the name Mohammad in England is any harbinger, his prediction may unfortunately be coming to fruition, with the demise of western civilization, its the long-intended goal.