White House bribing health insurance companies to keep rates down ahead of midterms

It was the line from The Godfather that will never be forgotten: “I’m gonna make you an offer you can’t refuse.” The Chicago thugocracy of Barack Hussein Obama took that tactic with health insurance companies to make them swallow Obamacare in the first place, and is now quietly bribing them to “postpone” rate hikes scheduled to come out right before the midterms.

According to Forbes.com, ” Hidden in the midst of a 436-page regulatory update, and written in pure bureaucratese, the Department of Health and Human Services asked that insurance companies limit the looming premium increases for 2015 health plans. But don’t worry, HHS hinted: we’ll bail you out on the taxpayer’s dime if you lose money. No wonder there wasn’t a press release. The White House is playing politics with Americans’ health care—and they’re bribing health insurance companies to play along.”

Ok, let me clarify: the Obama administration has sneaked in a regulatory rule update asking health insurance companies not to do their job accurately if it means higher insurance premiums. After all Obama — aka Vito Corleone — stated Obamacare would bring about an average reduction of $2500 to healthcare premiums. Now, here is the offer the insurance companies can’t refuse: “even if you’re losing money, we’ll square it away for you” — with taxpayer dollars of course.

So in the long run, the hard-working American middle-income family gets screwed either way! Either they’ll have to pay higher premiums or pay the government through higher taxes — such as Obama’s desired higher gas taxes — in order to compensate the insurance companies. And here we thought Obama REALLY didn’t like those insurance companies.

Now, silly me, I thought bribery was a felony offense. Oops, there I go again using logic and common sense when assessing the Obama administration — heck, they’re having problems with computer hard drives, bribery is just par for the course.

And to think the Washington Post just gave President Obama three more “pinocchios” for lying. Nah, none of this matters – it’s certainly not “impeachable.” It’s just liberal progressive socialist politics as usual — fear, intimidation, coercion, lies and deception. Can you imagine what would be happening if this were a revelation occurring under a Republican president?

But be careful, you don’t want to be accused of racial animus because you’re questioning the president’s bribery policy. And I don’t think the U.S. Department of Justice will be investigating this, do you?

Why is all of this happening now? Why it’s simple. There’s an election coming in November 2014 and the last thing Obama, his personal consigliere Valerie Jarrett and the Democrats want is for 2015 healthcare insurance premium increases to be announced in September. And Obama accuses everyone else of playing politics.

As Forbes reports, “typically, insurance companies release their premium rates between summer and early fall—i.e., right before voters cast their ballots in November. If premiums skyrocket—which looks increasingly likely—then voters won’t look too kindly on Senators and Representatives who voted for Obamacare and created this problem. Hence the White House’s desperate damage control. It almost worked: No one noticed when the regulations were first released. In fact, it took days for any news outlet to find the language and then translate it into readable English. TownHall.com figured it out first. The Los Angeles Times then reported that “hold[ing] down premium increases for next year” is a “top priority” for President Obama since “rates will be announced ahead of this fall’s congressional elections.” Wow, give the LA Times a Scooby Snack for getting that one right!

Forbes says “even if the healthcare insurance industry doesn’t want to play along, it’s still in these companies’ best interests to assent to the administration’s “request.” Under Obamacare, insurers are so heavily regulated that they have to play nice with the bureaucrats who call the shots. The president isn’t the only government official who carries a big stick. If insurance companies don’t give in, regulators have powerful ways to make life hard for them. A shrewd CEO doesn’t need to look far to see what might happen if his company opts out. This administration already has a reputation for strong-arming dissenting businesses in other industries.”

Don’t believe how bad it could be? Just ask the coal industry and the small community banks. Of course, this will once again be dismissed and the White House may still get away with its attempted sleight of hand. Technically, the regulations don’t force health insurance companies to hold down their premium increases. But the White House isn’t asking nicely. Does it ever?

If the GOP can awake from its stupor and acknowledge the other side doesn’t play nice, perhaps they’ll start winning elections. This is the politics of Moose and Rocco, and exactly what Americans consented to when they voted to have Chicago come to Washington D.C.

P.S. Hillary is from Chicago too.


    • You do read don’t you? Or did you just comment without reading the article? Try the link to the Forbes story. I realize you libs are very lazy but if you are trying to make a point try at least to be educated about your stance before you put your foot in your mouth

      • Hey, The_Patriot, why do you really put this fool in his place and point out exactly where the forbes site quotes that passage in the bill and regulatory update. Obviously he won’t see unless you do the work for him.

      • You can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make him drink. If the fool likes to remain and idiot, it doesn’t matter if you surround him by the perfect articles

      • I’m sorry, I was trying to point out the hypocrisy of your comment. (which you still don’t get, for hilarious reasons) You suggested that the OP doesn’t read and that the information was linked to in the Forbes story. Then, you went so far as to say, “I realize you libs are very lazy but if you are trying to make a point try at least to be educated about your stance”

        The funny thing is, there is no specific passage or regulatory update cited in the Forbes story. Obviously, you would know that if you happened to click on the link and go to the Forbes story. so.. I guess.. [I realize you are very lazy but if you are trying to make a point try at least to be educated about your stance before you put your foot in your mouth.]

      • I did get it, I just chose to ignore it. He is a troll, trolls are lazy by nature and only go for the insult. I am not a hypocritical person. I know what the answer was and is, I am not going to spoon feed people that choose to be morons

    • Weak and ineffective related to Foreign, Fiscal, and National Security policymaking. Strong-arming relative to the methods he resorts to when he inevitably fails otherwise. C’mon, son, try to keep up.

    • “…the organizer must be able to split himself into two parts — one part in the arena of action where he polarizes the issue to 100 to nothing, and helps to lead his forces into conflict, while the other part knows that when the time comes for negotiations that it really is only a 10 percent difference.” p.78
      ~Saul Alinsky, “Rules for Radicals”~

  1. Reminds of hearing “everyone deserves a home” and then there was the sub-prime lending going on, then foreclosures, the economy tanked, then came layoffs, bailouts, more layoffs…

    Come the 2014 elections, we the people had better get it right and rid ourselves of the RINO’s and Liberal Progressives.

    • Hey Troll, er, rather, Rafael – thanks for commenting with something valuable or insightful, as opposed to just taking (ineffectual, meaningless) pot-shots.

  2. I think Mr. West forgot to cite anything of remote substance or stature. This appears to be not much more than hearsay and conjecture. The people, Mr. West, are armed with information. This, sir, is nothing more than schoolgirl gossip.

    • Actually, check that, I think Forbes forgot to cite anything of remote substance or stature. All Mr. West did here was regurgitate someone else’s article.

  3. I think they are a little late. Everyone I know had their rates increase around 100%. I guess Sandra Fluke’s sex problem was more than they counted.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here