Immoral hypocrisy of Democrat’s late-term abortion bill

If there is any indicator that the Democrats are concerned about the impending midterm elections, look no further than their recent legislative endeavor. When in doubt, they go for a divisive issue, especially one aligned with the faux War on Women.

Funny how Democrats are using the compassion argument when it comes to the flood of illegal immigrant children into America. Yet they have no compassion for the thriving, healthy, but unborn American child who they support being butchered. What immoral hypocrisy — but all for political gain. It’s despicable.

As Chris Stirewalt writes for Foxnews.com, ” Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., is leading a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, a vote probably to be taken this week, on his bill that would override the laws banning late-term abortions and imposing regulations on abortion clinics in an increasing number of states.”

Stirewalt says “of course what Blumenthal doesn’t to address is that many of these “restrictions” were put in place after the horrific Dr. Kermit Gosnell case in Philadelphia, which the mainstream media didn’t seem to want to cover.” And these “restrictions” do offer support for women and protection.

We reported here about the drive for late-term abortions by a state representative in New York and what it entails. It basically amounts to brutal infanticide — that means killing babies.

According to Stirewalt, “Blumenthal’s bill, which already has the support of nearly two-thirds of Senate Democrats, would eradicate the restrictions in at least a dozen states where abortions have been banned after the start of the sixth month of pregnancy and rules in many more states that regulate the conditions at abortion clinics.”

Leave it to these liberal progressive socialists to do anything to save their own political skin – including murder ala Gosnell.

Stirewalt says “even the New York Times editorial board is enthused as are others on the Left who have seen access to elective abortions restricted in the aftermath of the discovery of a house of horrors at the Philadelphia abortion clinic operated by Dr. Kermit Gosnell. Blumenthal’s anti-anti-Gosnell bill takes Democrats into some very dangerous political territory.”

But with the support of a complicit media who will aid in the promulgation of their true intent and lies, the Democrats feel emboldened to take such an action.

Stirewalt posits that “Blumenthal’s hearing and legislation certainly is part of Democratic efforts to shift the election narrative and to frighten suburban women about Todd Akin-ite boogeymen lurking in every doctor’s office, it’s also evidence of the power of the left wing in the Democratic Party. One would have to imagine this hearing is designed to placate the vocal, well-funded pro-choice crusaders in the Democratic base and not designed to proceed even to a show vote.” We’ve already seen fundraising emails distorting the Supreme Court Hobby Lobby case decision.

But ponder this: Democrats and liberal progressives are so very staunch in their support of women’s choice in killing babies — but why are they so against women’s choice in educating their children? Oops, that’s right, they’re “owned” by the far left radical abortionists and the teachers unions.

So in the end, it’s not about the future of our children, it is all about politics, and placating their devoted leftist base. It’s about degrading women into nothing more than hapless victims whose basic need is to kill babies — not about greater opportunities for their future — just killing the future of life.

And the progressive socialists are masters of the lexicon as they have reframed this debate as fighting for women’s reproductive health — which should mean defeating cervical, uterine, ovarian cancers and fibroid tumor threats. Instead they’ve successfully changed language to mask their true intent — killing babies — as a means to achieve political power.

We all know where Barack Hussein Obama stands on this issue — after all when he was a state Senator he advocated for and supported legislation that a child surviving an abortion still deserved death. What type of demonic mind thinks that? Even worse, what does it say about our moral compass to have such a person as our president?

Look into the eyes of the people advocating this legislation — Richard Blumenthal, Tammy Baldwin, and others — and ask, what do you see within their souls?

Leave a Reply

28 Comments on "Immoral hypocrisy of Democrat’s late-term abortion bill"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
TimO515
Guest
To answer the question regarding survivors of abortion: the Presbyterian Church. Let’s get those claiming the name of Christ in order, they should know better. What do we expect from leftist, humanists? You also speak of accepting the arguments of the pro-killing crowd; well, I seem to remember reading not too long ago that you were OK with the traditional exceptions. If that is accurate, please explain how that is not excepting the enemies argument. We can’t regulate or accept ANY of this evil anymore than we could allow some states to own slaves. We are talking about a human… Read more »
jakefromstatefarm
Guest

The minute they are conceived!!

Just a thought
Guest
I find it interesting that people talk about life, when does it began, etc. I also believe that you have a right to feel as you do. I also believe that this is the United States of America and that the one thing about this country that is far superior to others is that we have freedom of beliefs, which also means that not everyone has to believe as we do. Same as far a religion goes. You may be protestant, Catholic, Hindu, Buddhist, Muslim, whatever and you can believe and worship as you wish. But there are others who… Read more »
Jasmin Chambers
Guest
That is way to simplistic. If everything were that simple, and people did live and let live so to speak, we would be able to have the Utopia that lots dream about. But, there are degrees of human-ness (humaneness if you will) and therein lies some of the reason why the ability to co-exist remains difficult, as it has been since the beginning. We always have our oneness fighting with our group collectiveness, and the collectiveness of other groups, whose collectiveness does not mirror the one you are in. The primordal also clashes with culture. The degree to which we… Read more »
Charles Hammond Jr
Guest

Because an embryo’s only crime is existence.

A person convicted of a crime is a person who has dome something horribly wrong.

The second had a shot at life and chose to use that precious opportunity to rob someone else of it

The first hasn’t even been born yet.

Ryan Fisher
Guest
Good points…I think that’s where people condemn themselves though, as you said: it is hypocritical to refer to life as sacred in terms of an unborn child yet support a war. I’m a firm believer in the death penalty, I understand that in 2014 war is inescapable, and I wouldn’t hesitate to end another’s life to protect my family. Yet, I will never be able to wrap my mind around abortion let alone late term abortions. It’s not because I feel life is sacred it’s because I feel that not giving one the chance to live because, in most cases,… Read more »
Eliott
Guest

I bet you have a coexist bumper sticker.

majorwiblit
Guest

Conservatives believe life begins when you make eye contact
at a Bar, or a Bar-B-Q……

Jasmin Chambers
Guest

And liberals believe life begins when you kill the little “mistake” you made ’cause you weren’t careful when you left the Bar, or the Bar-B-Q with that little spicy thing.

The_Patriot
Guest

Of course not, is it really essential for you to go to extremes? I think not, what happen to your being responsible? Oh wait you’re a lib you are never responsible for your own actions

majorwiblit
Guest

Funny,,,well not so much..You guys believe all life is sacred unless we’re discussing the death penalty or gun laws..

stephanie wilson
Guest

i’m pro innocent life.

Jasmin Chambers
Guest
Check out New York and Chicago! Tuffest gun laws anywhere in the nation. As an instructor, the thing that is needed is education on the proper handling of weapons. With that comes a respect for the weapon as a tool available to you. When people are unfamiliar with anything, it’s sometimes scarey or awkward. Think of the first time you drove a car. That is arguably a weapon under certain conditions. But, once you mastered it and became comfortable with the handling of it, it was a different situation. Years later, you don’t think twice about how to drive a… Read more »
The_Patriot
Guest

So you are saying it is okay to kill babies, but not mass murderers?

Eliott
Guest

Most of these hypocrites are in favor of abortion but against the death penalty. Yeah, kill the unborn but let a man who sexually molested and murdered a 10 year old girl live.

The_Patriot
Guest

Exactly and they like calling us crazy. The are out of their minds

majorwiblit
Guest

“I cannot understand anti-abortion arguments that centre on the sanctity of life. As a species we’ve fairly comprehensively demonstrated that we don’t believe in the sanctity of life.
The shrugging acceptance of war, famine, epidemic, pain and life-long poverty shows us that, whatever we tell ourselves, we’ve made only the most feeble of efforts to really treat human life as sacred.”
― Caitlin Moran, How to Be a Woman

stephanie wilson
Guest

who’s we?

Jasmin Chambers
Guest
So, old Caitlin’s theory is that since all this nasty business is going on, oh well, what’s a few more infants in a biohazard garbage dump? This is by far one of the stupidest arguments I have heard yet to justify the killing of babies. Yes, killing! Sanitizing the words “killing” or “murder” to the euphemistic “abortion” does not change the act! How could you NOT want to add the murder of babies at will to the list of not so nice things that happen on the planet. And come on! “Shrugging acceptance of war”. Really? I’m guessing you never… Read more »
Molly
Guest

What is your point? That we are not sufficiently respectful of life, so therefore we should not even try to be? Oh what the hell, we’re not very good at treating life carefully, so why not just let loose? Kill them all and let God sort them out, eh?

The_Patriot
Guest
So in essence you are saying it is okay to kill your own baby but not adults who are your enemy overseas, The same people that if you were standing in front of them would behead you? I do not think so. It is immoral to kill a 6 month term baby. Your’s or anyone else’s Shame on you for supporting the death of innocent (American) children. Then say No you cannot cast out kids from central America, because they came here illegally. The right thing to do is not abort our children and send the children from Central America… Read more »
Ferdinand Marcos 2.0
Guest

You’re an idiot. Troll elsewhere.

majorwiblit
Guest

ya,,ok

Josef Bercher
Guest

We should take a page out of the Progressive/Communist/Alinsky playbook and at every mention of one of these cur’s names, prefix it with the term “Babykiller”. Thus, Blumenthal becomes “Babykiller Blumenthal”. Of course there are some special cases, like “Dingy Babykiller Reid”, he gets an extra qualifier.

Sgtsnuffy
Guest

I’ve got an idea. How about a 4th or 5th trimester cut off date for
abortion???? Sound Good??? I think it’s a great idea, and we throw in
sterilization for free, how’s that for a perk. That way the War on women
is over since they won’t have to worry about getting pregnant anymore.
And they can have all the fun they want. If you want children we’re all for it, if you want an abortion fine and dandy too but ya gotta pay for it even though you get sterilized for free. Sound like a plan?????

sandraleesmith46
Guest

This has NEVER been about “reproductive health”which is far better served by abstinence, and/or pregnancy and actually nursing a term, delivered infant!It’s disgusting beyond words that these politicos use the amorality and abject ignorance of the so-called “educated elites” to further an agenda by LIES and deceitful distortion, and putting the lives of women in jeopardy both now and for the future to do so!

The Old Chip
Guest
Nancy Pelosi, one of the corrupt”O”crat elites, accepted Planned Parenthood’s highest honor – the Margaret Sanger Award. Now, consider how American blacks are aborting themselves out of significance if not out of existence. Black America is 13% of the population with as high as 36% of all abortions. (CDC data) Sanger – the founder of Planned Parenthood – was a racist eugenicist who called African Americans, immigrants and the poor “human weeds,” “reckless breeders,” “spawning… human beings who never should have been born.” American blacks, with 95% support for their black messiah and the corrupt”O”crats, the very people that espouse… Read more »
stephanie wilson
Guest

could not put it better myself! the hypocrisy of those black lives matter signs also sicken me. if black lives mattered to them, they should be protesting ”planned infanticide”, not to mention voting for the most pro abortion pres. in history!