The case for impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama

This morning on WMALs “Morning on the Mall” radio show with hosts Brian and Larry I was asked a simple question relating to the Taliban prisoner release and impeachment of the president. I responded yes that in this current case, the U.S. House of Representatives should file articles of impeachment against Barack Hussein Obama.

Now before all the detractors go apoplectic here, let me tell you about Article 2 signing statements, their intent, purpose, history, and usage, and the implications for the president’s impeachment.

President Obama used an Article 2 signing statement to deem unconstitutional a measure HE had signed into law contained in the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). The law stated that he must advise Congress within 30 days about any plans to transfer detainees from GITMO. Obama basically stated that this was “unconstitutional” and that his unilateral action fell within his purview. Once again Obama used selective discretion as to what law he feels he must adhere to — in this case it has severe ramifications for our national security.

Why would the United States acquiesce to the demands of a non-state, non-uniform terrorist organization — the Taliban? The Taliban is our enemy and it is not a nation-state with whom we should enter into negotiations. There are some 141 detainees at GITMO. The five released were senior Taliban officials, basically members of Mullah Omar’s inner circle. If we wanted to release detainees in exchange for Bergdahl, there were many others to choose from. Why these?

The rate of recidivism for GITMO released detainees has gone from 1 in 6 to 1 in 3 — and why would we think a one-year travel ban out of Qatar will be respected, or even make a difference with today’s modern communications technology? Even Obama has now stated they may just return to terrorist activity.

Obama’s breaking of the law in this case presents serious national security concerns — for all Americans. This is aiding and abetting the enemy, which goes along with the collusion of this administration with Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organizations and supplying weapons and arms to Islamists.

Obama just released the leadership of a terrorist organization, and what did we get in return? A deserter, who by his own self-proclamation harbors anti-American sentiments — which it seems that Susan Rice, our esteemed National Security Advisor, didn’t even realize his heinous actions — or maybe as usual she just lied about it again. Bergdahl served the United States with honor and distinction? Let’s not send Susan Rice out ever again.

To hear Obama state that “no American should be left behind” — has he forgotten about Benghazi and Marine SGT Tahmooressi? How about leaving behind American veterans to die?

Ladies and gentlemen, I submit that Barack Hussein Obama’s unilateral negotiations with terrorists and the ensuing release of their key leadership without consult — mandated by law — with the U.S. Congress represents high crimes and misdemeanors, an impeachable offense.

So I call upon the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives; Speaker John Boehner, Majority Leader Eric Cantor, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi to draft articles of impeachment as no one is above the law in America. The failure to do so speaks volumes.

Leave a Reply

1262 Comments on "The case for impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama"

avatar
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Eric Domejean
Guest

Do it, Please the Dems need to guarantee a win in the upcoming election, and this will help Hillary in the election following. Please Allen go forward.

wiggumc1
Guest
So I guess this law doesn’t matter then? 18 U.S. Code § 2339B – Providing material support or resources to designated foreign terrorist organizations (a) Prohibited Activities.— (1) Unlawful conduct.— Whoever knowingly provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life. To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization… Read more »
Eric Domejean
Guest

Are you talking about Reagan?

acornwebworks
Guest

He must be 🙂 I still remember Reagan selling 1,500+ missiles to Iran (in violation of our own darned embargo) in exchange for their “help” in getting the return of 3 of 7 Americans held by Iranian terrorists in Lebanon. And what happens next? The terrorists took 3 *more* Americans as hostages!

Sammie Miers
Guest

They wont remember any wrong doing by the Republican.

Noonespecial
Guest

Well, I’ll say this for you – you’ve taken blind loyalty to a whole new level. Have you ever considered your country over your politics? Ever?

Eric Domejean
Guest

Are you talking to yourself?

Noonespecial
Guest

No, I’m talking to you, traitor.

Eric Domejean
Guest

Wow you showed me. No one

Debbie Pataky
Guest

SERIOUSLY…..your Dems are destroying this country…….your an intelligent person why can you not see this? I am trying very hard to understand… I to voted for him in the first election…..I truly believed in the Hope and Change….but the lies, corruption, selective law breaking and the insult to my intelligence were just to much……double talk and the out and out lies….I am sorry it’s just to much…..someone needs to inform the White
House about VIDEOS…..HOW CAN YOU DENY WHEN THERE IS NUMEROUS VIDEOS OF YOU SAYING IT WITH DATE STAMPS.

Sammie Miers
Guest

I like to no why is all this stuff get blame on Dems. The Republican is just sitting on butts drawn a pay check.

Joe W.
Guest

So tell us, Eric. Give us ONE reason that you support Hillary Clinton. Just one. What, exactly, has she done or achieved that cause you to give her your support and your vote? And another question. Why are you so comfortable being ruled by a dictator, who continues to thumb his nose at the Constitution as well as the rule of law? Are you that much of a follower? A lemming?

Ken Largent II
Guest

I agree.

katy
Guest

This I find totally distressing Can his Muslim allegiance be any more obvious? He needs to go. Now. Period. The END. Never seen anything like it. Unbelievable. I will email all the Republicans stated at the end of he article.

tulet
Guest

For the past 2 years the president’s actions have broken numerous American Laws. What makes this so different from others that will compel congress to finally act. There has been no action to this point, and sadly the congress is to lame and without strong leadership to do what is right for America.

James2nd
Guest

nothing will come of this either. he is the Teflon President. many of his scandals have been grounds for impeachment, yet he still remains

Joe W.
Guest

It’s about damned time someone with a strong voice showed some balls and made the case for impeachment. Well done, Col. West. Well done, indeed.

Nathan Springstead
Guest

HERE HERE!!!!!

Toodumtu
Guest

There isn’t a set of balls in the whole damn lot of Congress to impeach this sorry aas excuse of a president. The Libturd Left side of Congress will no doubt stand with the Idiot in Charge, so it goes nowhere. Pity pity what our leadership in both chambers of Congress has come to.

ETXMMM
Guest

correction, there are VERY FEW “sets of balls”…..the ones with are far outnumbered by those without…..hence why nothing will get done…. bunch of big talking chicken shits….with a few exceptions

jackyjoe10
Guest

While many in the house of representatives would gladly work towards impeachment, boxed wine drinking Johnnie Boehner will have none of it. He prefers spending his days “in his cups”, not leading the Republican party or “We the People” for that matter. The whole thing stinks. This is without a doubt the very worst president in the history of our country. We can’t keep up with the scandals.

William Robert Guerra
Guest
William Robert Guerra

but i thought they were all fake. only created by the tea party to make president perfect look bad….

acornwebworks
Guest

They pretty much *are* all fake. Jeez, guys. Just calling something a “scandal” doesn’t make it one. Do you even know the meaning of the word?

Jim Robertson
Guest

I agree!

CanadaGoose1
Guest

No way will they impeach a black president.

Maggie E Thurston
Guest

Then make a big deal of impeaching his WHITE HALF!!!!

Joe
Guest

You have that right!!!!!!

Catahoula
Guest

This admin. is not even hiding it agenda anymore. We were told directly to our faces F you. We the people were handed our asses directly from the white house rose garden this past saturday. I would question the motives of any elected official that defends this BS.

Katsam!9
Guest
He needs to go along with anyone else who knew what he was doing when he was doing it. He continues to jeopardize our country and we the people. He just released the name of that CIA guy and now look at him. Like you said Allen he left 4 of our people behind in Benghazi and they were killed by those Obama supplied weapons to. How can he get by with that? How can there not be wrongful doings in what he’s done? Did you see how he stood there with a HUGE smile on his face while Bergdahl’s… Read more »
Wilecoyote
Guest

No balls congress will not even waste paper drawing up the article of impeachment…not with the senate in Dingy Harry’s hand…no matter what, the dems are very good at protecting their own…

bknapp
Guest

Impeachment is pointless without punishment. We need the Senate.

Jeffery german
Guest

It would be a joke, just like Clinton….. NOTHING will be done.

Brigadier
Guest

I agree Mr. West, but don’t hold your breath. The scum in DC don’t have the balls to do that to the first ‘black’ president.

bknapp
Guest

Two words why it hasn’t happened yet. Harry Reid.

Melvin_Udall
Guest

The biggest concern here is that I think Democrats would love an impeachment trial. They seem to be trying to instigate it.

Imagine the urban riots they’ll enjoy, and blame on Republicans.

Mark Stroh
Guest
Guys and Gals I rarely ever post anything political anywhere, but this time I have to stand up and say my piece. This week our President the Command and Chief of the greatest Armed Forces in the World bowed to terrorism and disgraced the office he holds, Our Country and the freedom she represents, along with every Man and Women in uniform today. We are the strongest country in the World with the best trained and equipped Military there ever has been, we do not negotiate with the enemy. We go out and find, punish and or destroy those who… Read more »
Boss of Wall Street
Guest
President Bill Clinton in 1992, 1993 was the Guy who helped the Republicans destroy America by joining NAFTA, WTO. By joining these two trade organizations he allowed every company in the USA to move jobs overseas to China. This allows every Corporation in America to save trillions of dollars on manufacturing labor cost. There by causing millions of American workers to lose their jobs and their families are still sleeping in the street. Then of course once these products are manufactured in China, these same companies can import these same Chinese produced products back into America without paying one penny… Read more »
humbleopinion
Guest

Thank you for your years of service to our country. Your unique perspective and spot-on analysis are most appreciated. Our president has freed an apogist who deserted his comrades and his nation in a war zone. Bengdahl is a most assuredly a traitor. And our commander-in-chief broke the law in renegade fashion to negotiate with terrorists and to release five of the most heinous enemies of our nation to attack us again. These five are reportedly moving about freely and under no particular observation. I am an American and I am wide awake!

acornwebworks
Guest
“…we do not negotiate with the enemy. We go out and find, punish and or destroy those who oppose our Nation and the freedom each of our Citizens’ hold so dearly”??? Oh yeah? Then wanna explain why Reagan violated his own darned embargo and sold over 1,500 armed missiles to Iran in order to free 3 of 7 American hostages…not all 7, just 3 of them…from Iranian terrorists…who then turned around and captured 3 more American hostages??? Or are you only against “breaking our own laws” and “caving into terrorists” when the President is a Democrat??? The fact is that,… Read more »
FriendofThom
Guest
People, put your thinking caps on, because I’m going to explain why Mark is wrong. First, even the great Ronald Reagan negotiated with terrorists, selling arms to Iran in exchange for the release of hostages. And Ollie North still says he’s proud of it. Second, there is no real evidence Bergdahl is a traitor, that he left the post “looking to join/ be with the Taliban.” His fellow soldiers said Bergdahl said he wanted to “wander the Earth” and speculated about whether he could walk through the mountains to China. If it’s true he looked for an Afghan who spoke… Read more »
Mark Stroh
Guest
I know I should not chase you down this rabbit hole, but merely agree to disagree, however I will address a few things here. When Reagan did what he did many years ago the term terrorist was not even in the laws that apply to this situation now. Second ” If it’s true he looked for an Afghan who spoke English and asked where to find the Taliban, it was because he wanted to explain that he was leaving and apologize for atrocities committed by U.S. troops, naively believing they would then give him safe passage out of the country.”… Read more »
acornwebworks
Guest

Apparently you think it was perfectly OK for Reagan to violate the sanctions against Iran, including the arms embargo, by sending over 1,500 missiles to them. And he was going to send more!!!

Yet you’re up in arms about Obama not “advising Congress within 30 days about any plans to transfer detainees from GITMO” because it’s “placed our Nation at a greater risk” of something-or-other.

You complain about “speculation” on the part of others, yet you’re just as guilty of it.

FriendofThom
Guest
The State Dept. recognized Iran as a state sponsor of terrorism in Jan 1984, before the Iran Contra affair. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_Sponsors_of_Terrorism My contention that Bergdahl sought out the Taliban to say he opposed the war and wanted safe passage out of the country is based on the record of Bergdahl saying he opposed the war and his talk of crossing mountains to China or India. There is no hard evidence he “consorted with the enemy.” That is pure speculation on your part. Prior to Bergdahl’s desertion, the mission was to find Taliban and kill them. I don’t think it was much… Read more »
OutspokenRed
Guest

Mr. Stroh, we are wide awake and we understand full well what this jerk-in-Chief has done. Just add it to a long list of his traitorous acts! We loathe and detest him, yet the only people who have any power to DO SOMETHING about it, REFUSE! I’m talking about you, Congress! Here’s the real question: what happens when a society comes to realize they have no power anymore?

FriendofThom
Guest

“President.. bowed to terrorism..” WHAT A CROCK OF CRAP!

HoG
Guest

The only “Crock of Crap” apparent here is you. You little ☭ommie troll.

Screeminmeeme
Guest

There is none so blind as he who will not see. You are attempting in vain to defend the indefensible…..and you’re a fool for doing it.

Mark Stroh
Guest

Perhaps you like the word cowered better? I am flexible.

HoG
Guest

Pay no attention to “ThomPaine12” AKA “FriendofThom”, he is a known ☭ommie troll.

Winston Blake
Guest

Sodom Hussein Obama and the Democrats are just a huge terror cell called “Al Queerda.”

They have a “spread the other cheek” philosophy.

bobcchicago
Guest

Republicans in Congress will let this go by without raising a finger. Just like every other scandal and lie that has taken place. They are cowards.

Jim Duff
Guest

Show us where to sign.

Jacqueline Comito
Guest

Please MAKE IT HAPPEN, Alan West !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

David Krutsinger
Guest

As a former member of the military, I will not be satisfied with anything less than treason.

Mark Stroh
Guest
Citizens we use to be a Nation that gave our enemies one option, their unconditional surrender. What has this Commander and Chief made us now? When I think of the families of the 6 Soldiers who lost their life’s trying to free this deserter, I wonder when they will get their all expense paid visit to the White House and their chance to address the Nation. I am not afraid to say it brings tears to my eyes. This so called leader’s actions can not be tolerated by this Nation! We are the Home of the Free Land of the… Read more »
acornwebworks
Guest

“Citizens we use to be a Nation that gave our enemies one option, their unconditional surrender.”

You mean like we did in Vietnam???

And how well did that nonsense go over in Korea? Or how about Iraq? Or Afghanistan? “Unconditional surrender” indeed.

Please stop with your delusions of grandeur. Americans are just human beings…just like everyone else. Not Supermen. And that includes our troops.
(Good grief. We wouldn’t have even won the Revolutionary War without the French.)

Winston
Guest

Bergdahl must be executed for his crimes against our nation. Obama should be as well for giving terrorists their demands. So what if they would have killed Bergdahl. He’s a filthy traitor.

Jeffrey Grimes
Guest

You people want it done? Then WHERE ARE OUR VETERANS? They should be en route to DC right now locked and loaded.

At this point THAT is what it will take to make them listen. QUIT SCREWING AROUND.

acornwebworks
Guest

Why aren’t you on your way there…”locked and loaded”???

Not a veteran? Don’t own a gun?? Just want someone ELSE to do your dirty work???

Changing the government is what ELECTIONS are about. And they are happening THIS YEAR!!! Are you even registered to vote???

John Ketterl
Guest

Jeffrey–you are right–where is our military handling this coup that has been going on for almost 6 years??? Get this POS traitor and his cronies out of our gov’t!!!

Jeffrey Grimes
Guest

Not just the military either: WHERE ARE THE CIVILIANS? The “OUTRAGED PATRIOTS”? We should be marching up there, armed to the teeth looking for a Citizen’s Arrest!

acornwebworks
Guest

And, as I asked you before, why aren’t YOU already on your way there???

Jeffrey Grimes
Guest

You act as if I can do it alone.

acornwebworks
Guest

Nope. Just that it’s so easy for any of us to make bold statements like “We should be…” without actually doing anything to make “it” happen.

The fact is that you are one of those civilians and, apparently, an “outraged patriot”…yet what are you doing? Besides posting about where “the others” are?

I’ll be honest. It sounds like you want someone else to take the first step. To make “it” happen. But why can’t you? Indeed, why shouldn’t it be you? If, indeed, you genuinely believe “it” should happen.

Jeffrey Grimes
Guest

I’ve proposed ideas and have asked for help. Too many people want to do it “their own way” or take the high road.

The question is how low people are willing to let these fools go before they realize that PC is no longer an option. As far as I am concerned, he already should have been in chains by Citizen’s Arrest.

acornwebworks
Guest

Perhaps you ought to seriously consider that the reason you aren’t getting the support you want is because…oh…maybe people think you’re wrong? That your plan is unwise? Or unsound? After all, making a citizen’s arrest opens you to all sorts of liability.

And what’s wrong with other people’s “their own way”??? Or taking the high road???

By the way, you can’t put someone in chains just because you proclaim “citizen’s arrest”. That, alone, would get you in a whole boatload of trouble.

Jeffrey Grimes
Guest

There are proper channels, and then there is a point where options are exhausted. War is brewing no matter what we do, so why wait for them to strike first?

Moreover, there IS a more peaceful solution that would require nothing more than mass cooperation.

acornwebworks
Guest
But most people don’t agree with you, so you’re not going to get that “mass cooperation”. Any more than there was mass cooperation with that “10 million person takeover of Washington” until Obama, etc. stepped down. What did they get? A few hundred people? Like the previous guy got about 30 trucks? Lots of people talk big. Doesn’t mean they’re actually going to do anything. And they’re certainly not going to go to war because there is no “war brewing”. That’s just emotional hyperbole on your part. As is your sad belief that “they” (I assume you mean the government)… Read more »
Jeffrey Grimes
Guest

So you are the liberal tool bag I thought you were. I suppose then that nothing else needs to be said.

Winston
Guest

Destroy their money support. Go after donors and shadow elite pulling the strings. Surely, you don’t think Obama is the genius behind this when every word he utters is scripted on a teleprompter? Start with Axelrod and Jarrett, then move on to CFR and TC members, Bilderbergers, Club of Rome, Skull and Bones, members of UN. You must cut off the head of the snake.

acornwebworks
Guest

You don’t have a clue what you’re talking about, do you?

And, of course, you’re perfectly fine with the Koch Brothers owning you lock, stock and barrel, aren’t you? ALEC? AFP?

Come on. Both sides are pulling the strings.

Betty Mullins
Guest

no one is white house going do nothing to his sorry ass . may as well forget it lot of people wasting their time and breath or money . what will be will be . ]

Jeffrey Grimes
Guest

I didn’t say White House did I? Are you really going to give up that easily?

Rancho Del Valkayrie
Guest

Just going to have to wait for “We Told you so” When the next bigger or biggest terrorist attack happens in country again. By that time though The Current Incumbent President will lounging thousands of miles away in the 50th state drinking tropical drinks and smoking Choom.

Lori Toupal
Guest

Don’tcha mean the 57th State?

Jeffrey Grimes
Guest

Oh, he won’t stay here. He knows he has a bounty on his head.

Shaun Grogan
Guest

As much as I would love to see this, it would be a worthless gesture. The Senate is the “Jury” in an impeachment and you all know they aren’t going to find him guilty. To do it now would just be pandering to your base for political gain.

jimshaw54
Guest

And give fodder to the liberals to use in the upcoming election. Perhaps this is why Obama did this now — knowing full well that there will be NO negative ramifications to his actions. When you pretty much own the press you can get away with a whole lot of things you shouldn’t be able to do.

Dee Handy
Guest

Nancy Pelosi will help block impeachment in a drop dead heart-beat and Harry Reid won’t EVER put it up for a vote in the Senate. All three should hang for crimes against the State along with Obummer.

halevi
Guest

Alan, sadly, you’re wasting your breath. Obviously, Pelosi won’t do this. Expecting Boehner, the crier and Cantor,the phony, to do something like this, is a pipe dream. In fact, Boehner and Cantor won’t do ANYTHING to punish Obama for this.

JD
Guest

You have no credibility.

1630
Guest

There’s sufficient difference of opinion among legal scholars on that signing statement to make this less clear cut than Allen suggests. We’re still feeling the effects of the political animus created by the Clinton impeachment that from a practical standpoint, this simply isn’t worth the effort. Someday, the GOP will have the presidency again and will need dem votes to pass legislation important to us. Let’s not poison the well further on an issue we know won’t succeed.

Winston
Guest

Are you crazy? You think with the Marxist, satanic mindset of the democrats republicans would ever get their vote on anything. The well is poisoned beyond repair. Our constitution is trampled daily. It’s on its way as a museum piece. You are delusional if you think our country will ever be it’s old self again. It’s gone forever.

M.O.T.L.
Guest

Agreed. I’ve heard enough of the “Oh, come on… We’ll just get out and vote and things will be good as new. These things happen and you can’t get your panties in a wad every time the economy takes a little dip…” Personally, I believe that the only prayer we have of regaining our country (the one we love) is a bloody war that would make the first civil war look like a picnic. Just my opinion…

Winston
Guest

Sadly, you are correct. People don’t want to believe that but they are delusional and believing the lie. Our people are not made of the stuff that made this country great in 1776.

1630
Guest
Delusional? Maybe. But I have a masters in history, as much time in service as Allen West and held the same rank (and served in the same time-frame)…I like to think that these things go in cycles and that we need to take the long view of events. Obama’s a disastrous president, but the republic’s gone through worse disasters before. My point is that winning elections produces better results than principled defeat, which is what an impeachment attempt would bring. Other than an element of the conservative movement, the American people don’t want Obama impeached. But an impeachment attempt will… Read more »
Jose Velazquez
Guest

I would love for nothing more than believe in your theory. But unfortunately I think that some of the damage done will not be easily repairable, of course nothing is impossible but it is a high pedestal to reach at this point, especially with the lack of action by some members of the republican party. I hope by all that is Holly that you are correct, and would not mind hearing you say “I told you So”

1630
Guest

What’s the saying? Success has a thousand parents, but failure is a bastard? Something like that…Put a competent conservative in the WH (2016 election) with a conservative congress (2014-16 elections), and a year later when the economy is booming, the dems will come to the center–they will be forced to by the electorate. The reverse is true for us. The GOP moved more to the center in 09-11 and would have been more accommodating to the Obama administration after that if he had a success to point to.

CustomDesigned
Guest

RINOs winning the Senate and Presidency would be worse than a failed impeachment. But I agree, getting RINOs out of the Republican party is more important than a doomed impeachment attempt. Boehner is almost as bad as Pelosi.

And if there are any old fashioned Democrats left, they can work on trying to take their party back from the Stalinists. I remember when Democrats were more Libertarian, and calling out Republicans on their unconstitutional Federal Drug War.

mercury
Guest

Although I agree with you Col. West, I suggest we wait until the Republicans have control of the Senate in 2015. I would also simultaneously impeach Holder and Obama.

David R. Nemirow
Guest

Let’s add Senator Bernie Sanders from Vermont, to the list. He killed a bill that would have allowed the head of the VA to fire any dirt-bag who isn’t doing his or her job. Sanders was “Outraged” because he was not given a chance to read the bill before voting on it. IT WAS THREE PAGES LONG>(3) pages, but he voted yes to the Affordable Care Act. It was 2409 pages long, so I suppose he read all of it before voting. Yeah! Right!

Winston
Guest

How can you guarantee that? We thought Romney was a sure thing too. Elections are manipulated by fraud, stolen. If repubs had both houses, they’d be forced to act. That’s why they won’t get it. Destruction of America is going to happen whether you like it or not. They have come too far to lose. They won’t have a problem killing you and your family for what they believe is the greater good. Only “the end” matters to them, not “the means.”

M.O.T.L.
Guest

Yeah – the midterms – I am concerned that we as conservatives/libertarians get too confident about “winning”. As Winston said, we thought Romney was a sure thing. I do not trust that the elections (if you want to call them that) are not totally fixed and that we will be stuck with Obama and company till hell freezes over.

Jose Velazquez
Guest

Unfortunately the way republicans are allowing POTUS to run with the ball, shows us that we have no faith in that the Republicans will carry out their duties either, nor is there the real possibility that they will win the Senate due to the lack of confidence in the Republican party by the people. Until this republican party shows some cojones, I do not see any real future change for the better.

Winston
Guest

I agree with you. See my answer to mercury.

Gordon Waite
Guest

Even if Impeachment articles get quashed by the democrats we need to do the right thing and initiate charges against the head traitor in charge of his posse of traitors, for history’s sake!

Rooster's Rage
Guest

This is not a matter of if Congress will or will not file article of impeachment and the one’s that try to block impeachment should be faced with prison for treason also.

Jose Velazquez
Guest

How many more constitutional law must POTUS break before he can be impeached. Are we waiting for him to cut US Soldiers loose on our streets to fire on American Citizens that are legally armed or do not agree with him. He will eventually declare martial law in accordance with his POTUS Directive 3025.18 Dec. 29th, 2010 Defense Support Of Civil Athorities (DSCA)

M.O.T.L.
Guest

Anybody shoots at me, they’re going to have a war on their hands. I do not trust this person claiming to be our president, nor do I trust the newly re-formed gay, illegal-alien, muslim infiltrated military. Today’s military is not the time-honored, loyal men of yesterday. Many of the current crop of “soldiers” is loyal only to the homosexual cause, islam or Mexico, and yes, they will fire on unarmed civilians if uncle Hussein tells them to.

Jose Velazquez
Guest

I would have to agree with you in the fact that the new guard is not the same as the old guard. and yes many will fire if ordered to, but I still know of many Good NCOs that would not allow this to happen if they can control it.

M.O.T.L.
Guest

I sure do hope so!

SGT Scientist
Guest

We will not be shooting at civilians. We only have to follow lawful orders. Of course, if some deranged fool civilian shoots at us, we have the right to defend ourselves, but I highly doubt the situation would ever arise.

Jose Velazquez
Guest

Also keep in mind that if Directive 3025.18 were to be activated then the shooting of civilians do not fall under unlawful orders.

David R. Nemirow
Guest

SGTScientist: I hope you are active duty. I am a Retired Vietnam Veteran, and you are right about differentiating between “Lawful” and “Unlawful” orders. I live just off base at Fort Campbell Kentucky, and speak to soldiers every day, as well as the fact that I have grandsons serving now. As I have written before, there is a big difference between those who might give an order to fire upon civilians, and those who would obey such an order. There are a few exceptions like Lt. Calley who slaughtered civilians in Vietnam, but this is not Vietnam.

SGT Scientist
Guest

My active duty days are behind me. I am National Guard now.

Jose Velazquez
Guest

There will definitely be those who would not follow those orders as well as those who will. it will all come down to individual morals.
Also I have been out since 1996. I have heard rumors through the years that Officer who would not order the firing on American civilians would be replaced by those that would. Again I consider this a rumor since I do not have first hand knowledge.

Jose Velazquez
Guest
As a Veteran I sure Hope that I am not forced to fight against my brothers, and sisters, that are currently on active duty. I would recommend that any and all read Directive 3025.18. you should not take my word for it, but believe what you read. their is also a current weapons buildup by other federal agencies to include each having their own SWAT teams. I would have to ask for what purpose other than Directive 3025.18 in an uprise of the Citizens in protest against the current government. God only help us all should this Directive ever be… Read more »
John Trapp
Guest

The pussy RINO party will never do it because they know liberals would start a campaign of calling them racist.

Winston
Guest

They are doing the bidding of the Marxist Jesuits. You may wish to read Malachi Martin’s “The Jesuits.” Eye-opening.

Scott Ellis
Guest

Things like this are exactly why it time for a “changing of the guard”. Primary elections are good place to start. I know I won’t be voting for a 37 year veteran of the current political machine today. Sorry Thad. It’s time for change!! Romans 13:11 “And do this, understanding the present time: The hour has already come for you to wake up from your slumber”,

Joe Skeen
Guest

Yawn.

beetle_bailey
Guest

You sir, are not only a part of the problem, you and others like you ARE the problem. Apathy is the precursor to evil run amok.

Joe Skeen
Guest

Uh huh. No, unlike you, I tend not to be able to judge people by a simple response on a story thread. I tend to allow the tried and true concept of “innocent until proven guilty” play out to its end. In other words I think things through and don’t act on emotion.

beetle_bailey
Guest

I have heard from a half dozen of Bergdahl’s peers who watched him walk away and run to the enemy. He is not innocent at that point. Obama plays fast and loose letting the equivalent of five four star generals go free. I think I’m on pretty solid ground here when I say this whole thing stinks and your “Yawn” statement shows nothing but apathy. Perhaps you have never served. I have, and we have each others six over there. We have been betrayed by both Bergdahl and Obama, and we are not happy. Judgmental, you betcha.

Rich Kardell
Guest

The only way this is any good is if we planted timed explosives way up the released terrorists’ asses. No way this will happen as our felching president reserves that area for his boyfriend.

Kevin Warren
Guest

Amen Col. West! Time to get a proper man in office like yourself or Dr. Carson

SGT Scientist
Guest

Obama will never be impeached. He could personally order the Taliban to take control of New York City, and he would be praised by the Leftist Main Stream Media and supported by every Democrat politician. Any opposition to any of Obama’s policies is already predetermined to be based in racist bigotry. Common sense is only common to a very few people, and none of them are effective politicians.

FriendofThom
Guest

Do you think idiotic BS like this really helps?

M.O.T.L.
Guest

Absolutely correct! Wait till his 3rd and permanent term. You think I’m krazy? Don’t be too hasty. LOTS of things we once said could NEVER happen have happened. Never say never.

Jose Velazquez
Guest

He did clearly state himself on an interview, that “if he could he would serve a third term”

EclecticHorseman
Guest

This from the man who said if he couldn’t turn the economy around in his first term he wouldn’t deserve a second one.

Phoebe
Guest

Oh he has turned it around, like in a centrifuge. This country is about to implode or explode. We are over 200 trillion in debt that has been created by BANKSTERS. NDAA allows the pres to grab any of us off the street and incarcerate us forever with out any trial. Veterans are labeled as domestic terrorists. He has forced resignation of over 200 admirals, generals, and colonels who won’t follow his orders to use military against American citizens.

CheetoBuster
Guest

This is why I have so much respect for Allen West. Too bad the good for nothing republicans in office don’t have the balls to stand against Obama’s lawlessness!!

M.O.T.L.
Guest

Well, it’s either ball-less-ness or they are complicit. Only logical possibilities. I am disgusted by either.

elaine williams
Guest

articles of impeachment would go nowhere in the current Senate, where hearings are conducted. Reid would laugh it off. In 6 months, we can change that by removing Democrats in the Senate. Vote.

taliesin319
Guest
That does not matter. It would be on record that he was impeached and brought to trial. The Senate could only refrain from expelling him. We all know that our toad Harry Reid would be apoplectic If they did. None of them would escape the scorn of those who know they enabled a traitor and sympathizer of Islamic terrorists to go unscathed. As for the whinning deserter who caused the deaths of 6 of his unit members. He should rot in Leavenworth as Hassan’s caretaker and cell mate. They could babble off verses from their heinous koran to while away… Read more »
undunder
Guest

Bill clinton didn’t suffer much for being impeached. They make jokes about it. The senate is an embarrassment and the libs have no intention of relinquishing control regardless of what they have to do to retain power there. I’m just waiting with great curiosity to see what they will do to keep control of the senate and the demented harry reid in control.

CheetoBuster
Guest

History will not be kind to republicans. Future generations will be asking why the republicans didn’t fight against Obama. Even if the democrats protect Obama, at least history would show Republicans tried to do something, and it will be the democrats that will look horrible.

undunder
Guest

What future? The one the Founding Fathers dreamed of and laid the groundwork for? Or the one obama dreams about? We need to be clear; they are not one and the same future.

Winston
Guest

The future will not have two parties and history will be revised by the victors.

Sgt Snuffy
Guest
“Obama’s breaking of the law in this case presents serious national security concerns — for all Americans. This is aiding and abetting the enemy, which goes along with the collusion of this administration with Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated organizations and supplying weapons and arms to Islamists”. Doesn’t this even in the least bother anyone at the NAACP, SPLC or any of the other Black Organizations that are supposedly fighting for the very freedoms that ISLAM would take away???? Why is it that Progressives always always side with the very enemies that would kill them????? Is it some kind of sick death cult… Read more »
MikeyParks
Guest

They’re stupid enough to believe that if they’re kind to the crocodile, they’ll be the last ones eaten.

SGT Scientist
Guest

Why do you have to up-vote your own post in order to see who else up-voted your post?

Cathy Vettes
Guest
patriotforrevo
Guest

The BIG question, why did KILLary and ObamaJahd have a secret meeting last Thursday? Are they getting to close on Benghazi and had to create a smoke screen?
I know he is definitely hiding something BIG!

Phoebe
Guest

Lots of somethings!

SGT Scientist
Guest

If President Obama were a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, what would he be doing differently?

undunder
Guest

If?

MikeyParks
Guest

Let’s wait until December and make it stick.

dragonladyalso
Guest
Don’t know about anyone else but I am at the point where it’s “fish or cut bait time.” I will not vote for any US Representative who does not stand up and call for the impeachment of obama – NOW – not next month – not “after the election.” = NOW. Accordingly, I will not vote for anyone running for the the US Senate, or currently a member of that body, who does not stand up and demand that the House start impeachment proceedings against him. Before anyone says it, I am fully aware that the trial of an impeached… Read more »
SGT Scientist
Guest

Not gonna happen. Period. The Republicans will never impeach Obama because of the color of his skin, not the content of his character. Democrats will never impeach Obama because they think he’s doing the right thing.

Justin Crenshaw
Guest

So, Mr. Allen West when are you going to run for president???

Okbmd
Guest

NO ONE HAS THE GUTS TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT OBUMMER!! Everyone is either a sissy or are in on the deal right along with him. It’s so disgusting that we have such dishonest people in our government today. Who can we actually trust to be honest and get the job done? I can’t think of anyone.