New Benghazi documents prove tangled web of White House lies

When I was growing up I remember a little saying that went like this: “Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.”

Well, it seems the chickens – or perhaps I should say the spiders — are coming home to roost for the Obama administration regarding Benghazi. The question is, does the American public care more about four dead Americans than they do about disgusting private comments from an NBA owner?

Let’s play connect the dots on this tangled web.

David Rhodes is the President at CBS News. Ben Rhodes is the White House Deputy National Security advisor. David and Ben are brothers. Sharyl Attkisson worked at CBS. As a highly respected and acclaimed investigative reporter, Sharyl wanted to report the truth about Benghazi. Sharyl does not work at CBS News anymore.

However, she has a website, and there she reports that sharylattkisson.com, “Newly-released documents reveal direct White House involvement in steering the public narrative about the September 11, 2012 terrorist attacks in Benghazi, Libya, toward that of a spontaneous protest that never happened.

As if we had any doubt.

According to Attkisson, one of the key documents, which the government had withheld from Congress and reporters for a year and a half, is an internal September 14, 2012 email to White House press officials from Ben Rhodes, President Obama’s Assistant and Deputy National Security Advisor.

In the email, Ben Rhodes lists as a “goal” the desire of the White House “To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.” The email is entitled, “RE:PREP CALL with Susan, Saturday at 4:00 pm ET” and refers to White House involvement in preparing then-U.S.Ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice for her upcoming appearance on Sunday television network political talk shows. The Rhodes email states that another “goal” is “To reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.”

Ben Rhodes is hardly the “mastermind” behind this episode, but the email he sent out to a who’s who list of recipients is damning. Attkisson says, “White House officials copied on the Rhodes “goal” email include Press Secretary Jay Carney, then-Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer, then-White House Senior Advisor David Plouffe, then-White House Deputy Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri and Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest.

Therefore, we definitively know it was the Obama White House that developed the scheme of blaming an anti-Islam video. Funny, the only person who has been punished in this whole charade was the video producer.

The most transparent administration is US history? Hardly. Attkisson says “Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) told her the government apparently tried to keep the Rhodes email out of Congress and the public’s hands by changing its classification it after-the-fact. In the past month, the government has supplied 3,200 new Benghazi-related documents under Congressional subpoena. In some instances, Congressional members and their staff are only permitted to see the documents during certain time periods in a review room, and cannot remove them or make copies. Chaffetz says that the State Department redacted more material on the copies provided to Congress than on those that it was forced to provide to JudicialWatch.”

What a tangled web of lies, deceit, and obfuscation hangs around the neck of this Administration — and the presidential hopes of Hillary Clinton. Attkisson is free to pursue this travesty, and combined with Catherine Herridge at Fox News and Tom Fitton’s Judicial Watch, they form a formidable phalanx for the truth. The days of information suppression and manipulation by fellas like David Rhodes ad David Brock are waning, as their complicit actions entangle them as well.

I can’t wait to hear White House mouthpiece Jay Carney — who just happens to be married to ABC reporter Claire Shipman — ramble and attempt further obfuscation about these new Benghazi documents.

37 COMMENTS

  1. Obama’s propaganda machine (MSM) is 100% complicate in Obama’s Treasonous acts against the United States of America and should face the same justice.

    • They are complicit, there is no doubt. They run interference for him at every opportunity. They are guilty of keeping the low information voter “informed” as to what to vote and who to vote for.

  2. quote “…(Rep.) Chaffetz says that the State Department redacted (blacked out, hid) more material on the copies provided to Congress than on those that it was forced to provide to JudicialWatch.”

    • Remembering Watergate and the long, long continual pounding on the White House to provide details…the continual probing, etc. Over a President who ordered wiretapping of his political opponents (essentially) and then was badgered into resigning his office. Wow. Our definition of “bad” certainly has changed from then to now.

      • Of course we also forget that wiretapping and surveiling political opponents was common during the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations

  3. Ahhh,,were are the ones that usually come on here and say Benghazi is over, it’s just a witch hunt,there is nothing too this, it been debunked! When all along the investigation has had more road blocks thrown up by the most transparent administration ever aided and abetted by the so-called MSM ! The hypocrites can only now say it’s over why beat a dead horse and just give cover to the lying ,because it is their liar! Well this bullcrap of who’s bull is being gored will come back to haunt them all!

  4. Stay on the *Demand Benghazi Truth Train* Patriots!

    It is slow moving because the Old Media Gatekeepers are Obama Cheerleaders, but the train *is* moving incrementally forward ….

    DEO GRATIAS for the New and Social Media which are disseminating the information to the Public, under and around the LAPDOG Gatekeepers …

    “Be sure your sins will find you out” …. Obama and Hillary

    “There is nothing hidden that shall not be revealed …”

    #BeClingers —————————> #AmericaRISING

  5. You need to pay me to proofread your posts…seriously…I am hesitant to repost/share this important information due to so many mis-spellings, mistakes, etc…

    • “What Difference Does It Make”, Per Hillary? I think they are all going to find out, because the majority of us support “Our Military” and we want the damn answers of what happened.

  6. Just think, hillary’s first grandchild will probably be born the same year she and obama go down for the murders of the Benghazi Four. It will be their “legacy”..

  7. The Democrats like to go back in History to say “someone else did the same thing” so it is time for them to review what happened when Nixon resigned because of his lying and covering up. Nixon would not have resigned but Republicans stood up and said “for the good of the Country you need to go”. Are there any Democrats that will place the ‘good of the Country’ over their Political Party. Anyone that has an ounce of integrity knows that Obama and his cohorts have lied when the truth suits best. Covering up, lying, and divisive rhetoric has become the trademark of this Administration. It is sad that there hasn’t been a large outcry of ‘ENOUGH’. Americans need to stand up and let everyone know that White, Black, Latino or other is not above being held to high Morals and Ethics. When does it start?

    • Unfortuatenly, BIB, the Democratic party things that they are the “good of the country” no matter what carp they toss onto the American people. That is because they will provide financial support (aka bribes) to the population to stay in power. The only way to stop this is to have people turn away from their free stuff. That is not going to happen.

  8. Thank you for sharing this. And it was just before the election, eh?

    FWIW: “failure or policy” should read “failure of policy”.

  9. When Killary and Barry finally get caught. They will respond, we did it for political reasons, not to upset Syria. It was a shame these 4 were killed but it saved Millions of Lives. There will be clapping as loud as thunder, from the hooves of the sheep. Hell they might even get a medal.

  10. When is the great colonial going to recognize the fact that, the folks he appeals to are overtly racist? He’s either an uncle tom or a Judenräte. You white folk will never take him seriously. You hate A.A’s

  11. The Benghazi attack was one of those “all of the above” events

    1. The people there when interviewed actually did say they were there to avenge the video’s insults

    2. Many there were also from a brigade from Ansar al Sharia, but leadership said they were not officially sent

    3.
    It was known that some in the area might be planning an attack at some
    point, but it is not known if any attack was planned for that day, the
    brigade’s leadership said they were not officially sent

    So when someone says that is was over the video – the truth

    When some say that it may have been spontaneous – the truth

    When some say it may have had some preplanned elements – truth

    Act of terror – truth

    All
    we know is that it was an act of terror that may have been in the
    process of being planned, but became a spontaneous act due to the video

    Obama
    put it best on David Letterman when he said it was an act of terror and
    that the video was likely used as an excuse to attack

    Everything the administration said is consistent with the news reports

  12. Why not push for second degree murder charges against any and all who could have prevented this tragedy and s chose not to.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here