Rice has “no regrets” over Benghazi info not being 100 correct at the time, i.e. lies

Here’s a question for you: how do you contend with non-elected civilian leaders who know they’re lying, find comfort in doing so, and have no qualms about continuing to do so?

Such is the case with Obama administration National Security Advisor Susan Rice. As reported by FoxNews.com, Rice said Sunday she has no regrets over what she told the American public about the 2012 Benghazi terror attacks in the immediate aftermath of the deadly strikes.

“What I said to you that morning, and what I did every day since, was to share the best information that we had at the time,” Rice told NBC’s “Meet the Press” moderator David Gregory on Sunday. “The information I provided … was what we had at the moment.” Rice said “No,” when Gregory asked whether she had any regrets about her statements.

Rice continues to lie at a time when the American people know her assertion that “it was the best information we had at the time” is not correct. She weasels around it by saying, “That information turned out, in some respects, not to be 100 percent correct,” Rice said. “But the notion that somehow I or anybody else in the administration misled the American people is patently false. And I think that that’s been amply demonstrated.”

What was amply demonstrated was the patent absurdity of her claim that anyone in the administration misled the American people. Almost two weeks after the Benghazi Islamic terrorist attack, President Obama stood before the UN General Assembly and still harped on about an anti-Islam video. As well, the question has to be asked, why was Susan Rice chosen to address an issue that was clearly in the purview of the Secretary of State? At the time, Rice was the ambassador to the United Nations, hardly in a position to comment on a terrorist attack against a US Consulate resulting in the death of an American ambassador.

Could it be she was just a loyal lieutenant willing to say and do whatever is asked of her? Could it be she was being set up to take the fall for Hillary Clinton, to preserve the latter’s presidential chances? And as a result, she was rewarded with a promotion to National Security Advisor, a position for which she is totally unqualified — well, I guess that’s par for the course, considering who we have masquerading as Commander-in-Chief.

Rice said Sunday she didn’t know whether her responses killed her chances of getting the top U.S. diplomatic post. I don’t know,” she said. “What I do know is that I [now] have a great job.”

Her responses should have sent her away from any service to this nation in shame. I can only imagine what would be happening on the pages of the New York Times, Washington Post, and all across the liberal media world if Benghazi occurred under a Republican presidential administration — would they be so cavalier and dismissive?

Susan Rice is a liar, who works for a liar who is leading America down the road to perdition. The painful truth will become evident, very soon.

29 COMMENTS

    • Impeachment would be for a legitimate president or official. Obama is there in office by criminally and fraudulent means. Treason is the problem and he needs to be carried out and arrested so that he can no longer bring harm to the Amercian people.

  1. Why would she? None of them in the Obama Administration has any Ethics including him. We can’t even get the truth about what happened and why in Benghazi or anything else that has happened in this Administration.

  2. Why was there a conspiracy at the highest level of govt, to lie to America and the grieving families about #Benghazi? pic.twitter.com/4pH0lSsuiH

    • For the reason of hiding the gun running barry was doing. He was sending guns from Libya to Syrian Rebels (Al Qaeda) to over throw Assad. He was doing it illegally and didn”t want to get caught. Stevens essentially was a bargaining chip, that went bad. Instead of being kidnapped he was killed. He also knew too much about barry as he was ex-CIA in Africa for 15 years or more

  3. Like most Libs, Susan Rice also has a history of looking the other way, saying nothing, doing nothing…even if people are being brutally murdered.

  4. Beee Ester, you folks look more and more foolish, every time you bring this up as a significant piece of currant news. It just ain’t.

      • There are two weeks of numerous video tapes of them blaming an anti-Islamic video for Benghazi when they knew that was untrue. The American people know the truth and the lies were exposed on national TV time after time after time.

      • No. No tapes, Prez called it terror the next day. There was a video that caused unrest in Cairo that evening and it was shown in Benghazi on the news, Video was indeed part of the problem. No A.Q in Benghazi. Keep making stuff up.

      • It was a youtube video that had very few clicks on it prior to Rice, Obama, Hillary and Biden blaming it for the attack on Benghazi. If these were peaceful Muslims run amok as they suggested, how did they happen to have RPGs, rocket launchers, mortars, automatic weapons in trucks and the security tapes showed they knew where the saferoom was as if someone from the inside had given them information. Then they hauled all of that over to the annex and made strategic strikes there, too. Also, it just happened to be on the anniversary of 9/11.

        This was obviously an excuse to protect Obama in an election at a time when polls were showing a majority thought he was weak in the area of foreign affairs. It made his foray into Libya look like a mistake, billions spent to help them and they still hate the U.S. and Obama. Obama had spent the previous year saying, “Bin Laden is dead and al Qaida is decimated and on the run.” The attack showed al Qaida was growing instead.

        The lie was about his campaign. He and his minions were willing to lie to the American people for party politics, showing us that we have good reason not to trust him or his party.

      • So, it’s racist to acknowledge when a black person, a black president, has lied to you. Is that some affirmative action kind of baloney? I don’t get the xenophobe remark since Obama isn’t a foreigner. He was from Hawaii and his mother and grandparents who raised him were natural born U.S. citizens

    • Bush didn’t attack the embassies. Bush didn’t blame the U.S. for causing the attacks on the embassies. Bush didn’t pretend that anti-Islamic civilians in the U.S. caused the attacks on the embassies. Bush didn’t promise on international news media that he would get the anti-Islamists in the U.S. and punish them for the acts of militant terrorist Muslims attacking U.S. embassies.

      Obama, Hillary, Rice and Biden are not being condemned for the attack in Benghazi. They’re being condemned for lying about the Egyptian Coptic Christian’s video causing peaceful Muslims to suddenly attack the consulate and the annex with heavy artillery. It’s about the lie.

      • No, But you see the video did indeed inspire some of the attackers. Others took advantage of that. Also Benghazi was not an embassie, It was an annex operated by the CIA not the State Department. Get your facts straight

      • No, wrong again. It wasn’t an EMBASSY, it was a CONSULATE where the ambassador was killed. The marines came from the ANNEX. The al Qaida affilliated terrorists, not peaceful Muslims out for a walk as Hillary said, then used trucks to transport the rocket launchers, RPGs, mortars and other weapons as well as themselves from the CONSULATE to the ANNEX and made a strategic attack.

        You should get your factS straight. Oh, that’s right. You can’t get your facts straight because you’re only trying to repeat the lies the Obama’s campaign advisors created as a CYA for his lack of foreign policy experience.

      • You and the Democrats disgrace yourselves with your dishonesty. You underestimate the intelligience of the American people by pretending they didn’t hear the testimony in the Congressional hearings. It’s incredible that the game plan of this administration, every time they get caught in a lie, no matter how much evidence there is against them, they resort to more lies and then just deny, deny, deny.

        In November and in 2016, you’ll see the result of the polls that show that the Obama, Hillary and the Democrats are not trusted.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here